Change in reading of the scale when putting ball in a container of alcohol

In summary, placing a ball in a container of alcohol causes the scale to read differently due to the displacement of the liquid. The weight measurement changes based on the volume of alcohol displaced by the ball, illustrating principles of buoyancy and density.
  • #1
MatinSAR
612
188
Homework Statement
We have a container in the shape of a cube whose side length is ##10cm##. We pour alcohol with a density of ##0.8g/cm^3## up to a height of ##8cm##. We put the container on the scale and the scale shows the number ##700g##. We remove the container from the scale and put a solid ball with a density of ##6g/cm^3## in the container. Now we put the container on the scale again and the scale shows the number ##2160g##. What is the mass of the bullet?
Relevant Equations
Newton's Laws.
The container and water inside it are at rest.
1697810801437.png

##F_{net,y}=ma_y##
##N - (m_{container}+m_{water})g = 0 ##
##N = (m_{container}+m_{water})g##
##m_{container}+m_{water}=700g##
##m_{container}+\rho_{water} V=700g##
##m_{container}+0.8(10*10*8)=700g##
##m_{container}=60g=0.06kg##

Now we put a ball in container so the number that scale show should change.
The volume of water displaced is equal to the volume of the ball. As a result, the water level should rise to a height of ##0.08+ \dfrac {V_{ball}}{0.1*0.1}##.
##V_{ball}=\dfrac {m_{ball}}{ \rho_{ball}}##

We calculate new pressure:
##P=\rho g h_{new}=800*10* (0.08+ \dfrac {V_{ball}}{0.1*0.1})##

Now we calculate normal force sacle exerts on container:
##N = (m_{container}+m_{ball})g + PA##

But it gave me wrong answer. Can someone guide me where my mistake is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So container + alcohol is 700 g
and container + alcohol + ball is 2160 g ?

:rolleyes:

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #3
BvU said:
So container + alcohol is 700 g
and container + alcohol + ball is 2160 g ?

:rolleyes:

##\ ##
You are overlooking something.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU and MatinSAR
  • #4
MatinSAR said:
Can someone guide me where my mistake is?
@BvU's hint is a good start, but there's more to it. The next step is to calculate the volume of the ball that it implies.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #5
BvU said:
So container + alcohol is 700 g
and container + alcohol + ball is 2160 g ?

:rolleyes:

##\ ##
As question stated, yes.
haruspex said:
@BvU's hint is a good start, but there's more to it. The next step is to calculate the volume of the ball that it implies.
The ball is completely in alcohol so we consider it's total volume.
 
  • #6
MatinSAR said:
The ball is completely in alcohol so we consider it's total volume.
No, you are missing the point.
First, @BvU is hinting at a trivial calculation to find the mass of the ball. But having done that, the next step is to deduce its volume.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #7
haruspex said:
No, you are missing the point.
First, @BvU is hinting at a trivial calculation to find the mass of the ball. But having done that, the next step is to deduce its volume.
Why is the volume needed? The question posed is "What is the mass of the bullet?"

On edit: I now see why the volume of the ball/bullet is needed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #8
kuruman said:
Why is the volume needed? The question posed is "What is the mass of the bullet?"
Bullet? Ball? Whatever. Unless it absorbs alcohol, the volume matters.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and erobz
  • #9
haruspex said:
Bullet? Ball? Whatever. Unless it absorbs alcohol, the volume matters.
I confirm. They are being sneaky!
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #10
There is a reason they say that the container is not on the scale when they add the ball.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and TSny
  • #11
There is no bullet. We have a ball in container. it was a mistake in my translation, sorry.
haruspex said:
No, you are missing the point.
First, @BvU is hinting at a trivial calculation to find the mass of the ball. But having done that, the next step is to deduce its volume.
So it's mass should be 1460g.
$$V=\dfrac {m}{\rho}=\dfrac {1460}{6}=243.33cm^3$$
 
  • #12
MatinSAR said:
There is no bullet. We have a ball in container. it was a mistake in my translation, sorry.

So it's mass should be 1460g.
$$V=\dfrac {m}{\rho}=\dfrac {1460}{6}=243.33cm^3$$
Now do you notice something about the volume here?
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #13
erobz said:
Now do you notice something about the volume here?
This way ##43.33cm^3## water should pour out of the container.
 
  • #14
MatinSAR said:
This way ##43.33cm^3## should pour out of the container.
Right. So how are you going to find the mass of the ball? Try to write some equations, introducing new unknowns as necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #15
MatinSAR said:
This way ##43.33cm^3## should pour out of the container.
Right, its over the volume remaining in the container. So you need to adjust your model to account for some mass of the alcohol spilling out of the container. Also, you don't have to look at pressures like you were before.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #16
haruspex said:
Right. So how are you going to find the mass of the ball? Try to write some equations, introducing new unknowns as necessary.
erobz said:
Right, its over the volume remaining in the container. So you need to adjust your model to account for some mass of the alcohol spilling out of the container. Also, you don't have to look at pressures like you were before.
$$m_{container}+m_{alcohol}+m_{ball} = 1460g$$
$$60 + 0.8(800-43.33)+m_{ball} = 1460g$$
$$m_{ball} = 794.66g$$
 
  • #17
MatinSAR said:
$$m_{container}+m_{alcohol}+m{ball} = 1460g$$
$$60 + 0.8(800-243.33)+m{ball} = 1460g$$
$$m{ball} = 954.66g$$
It's an unknown amount of volume that spills out. You have to calculate it with a new model. Can't use the last one, because it didn't account for any spillage. You were acting as though it all stayed in the container on that one. When you found the volume of the ball is greater than what was left it invalidates the model you used to find its volume.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #18
erobz said:
It's an unknown amount of volume that spills out. You have to calculate it with a new model. Can't use the last one, because it didn't account for any spillage. You were acting as though it all stayed in the container on that one. When you found the volume of the ball is greater than what was left it invalidates the model you used to find its volume.
I was working on 2 questions at one time. I'm sorry for my huge mistake in last post. I will retry.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
  • #19
$$m_{container}+m_{alcohol}+m_{ball}=2160$$$$60+0.8(1000-V_{ball})+6V_{ball}=2160$$$$V_{ball}=250cm^3$$$$m_{ball}=\rho_{ball} V_{ball}=1500g$$

Thank you to everyone who has helped me to solve this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu, TSny, dlgoff and 1 other person

FAQ: Change in reading of the scale when putting ball in a container of alcohol

What happens to the reading of the scale when a ball is placed in a container of alcohol?

The reading of the scale will increase by the weight of the ball. This is because the scale measures the total weight of the container, the alcohol, and the ball combined.

Does the buoyancy of the ball in alcohol affect the scale reading?

No, the buoyant force affects the apparent weight of the ball in the liquid, but the scale itself measures the total weight of the system, which includes the ball, alcohol, and container. Therefore, the scale reading reflects the combined weight regardless of buoyancy.

How does the density of alcohol affect the scale reading when a ball is submerged?

The density of alcohol does not directly affect the scale reading. The scale will show an increase equivalent to the weight of the ball, irrespective of the alcohol's density. However, the buoyant force experienced by the ball will depend on the alcohol's density.

If the ball floats in the alcohol, how does it change the scale reading?

Even if the ball floats, the scale reading will still increase by the weight of the ball. The floating ball displaces a volume of alcohol equal to its own weight, but the total weight measured by the scale remains the sum of the ball, the displaced alcohol, and the container.

Would the scale reading be different if the container were placed on the scale before adding alcohol and the ball?

No, the method of adding the container, alcohol, and ball does not change the final scale reading. The scale always measures the total weight of all components combined. Adding them in any order will result in the same total weight being measured.

Similar threads

2
Replies
67
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top