MHB Change of variables in a function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the transformation of the function u from variables ξ and η to x and t, specifically how to express u(x,t) in terms of F and G. The relationship is established through the wave equation u_{tt} - c^2u_{xx} = 0, leading to the conclusion that u(ξ, η) can be represented as F(ξ) + G(η). By substituting ξ = x + ct and η = x - ct, it follows that u(x,t) = F(x + ct) + G(x - ct). The integration of the second derivatives confirms the independence of the variables, ultimately supporting the derived form. This transformation is crucial for understanding wave motion in the context of partial differential equations.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Given
$$
u(\xi,\eta) = F(\xi) + G(\eta)
$$
and
$$
\xi = x+ct\qquad\qquad \eta = x -ct.
$$

How do we get to $u(x,t) = F(x+ct) + G(x-ct)$?

I see that we can make the sub
$$
u(x+ct,x-ct) = F(x+ct) + G(x-ct)
$$
but how do I then get simply $u(x,t)$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
Given
$$
u(\xi,\eta) = F(\xi) + G(\eta)
$$
and
$$
\xi = x+ct\qquad\qquad \eta = x -ct.
$$

How do we get to $u(x,t) = F(x+ct) + G(x-ct)$?

I see that we can make the sub
$$
u(x+ct,x-ct) = F(x+ct) + G(x-ct)
$$
but how do I then get simply $u(x,t)$?
I'm not prepared to discuss this fully, but this is not a simple matter of a change of variables. The function u(x, y) has to solve the Partial Differential Equation:
u_{tt} - c^2u_{xx} = 0

This is the 1D wave equation with wave propagation speed c. The change of variable of the characteristic lines leads to the replacement
x + ct = \xi and x - ct = \eta

which changes the PDE to
u_{\xi \eta} = 0

More explanation than this should probably be given by someone else until I bone up on the solution.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm not prepared to discuss this fully, but this is not a simple matter of a change of variables. The function u(x, y) has to solve the Partial Differential Equation:
u_{tt} - c^2u_{xx} = 0

This is the 1D wave equation with wave propagation speed c. The change of variable of the characteristic lines leads to the replacement
x + ct = \xi and x - ct = \eta

which changes the PDE to
u_{\xi \eta} = 0

More explanation than this should probably be given by someone else until I bone up on the solution.

-Dan

I already solved that. I wondering how I get back to $u(x,t)$.
Here is where I am at

$$
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} = 0.
$$
Let's take the standard form of the wave equation $u_{tt} = c^2u_{xx}$.
Then by the chain rule
$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial\xi}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi} + \frac{\partial\eta}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial\eta} = \frac{\partial}{\partial\xi} + \frac{\partial}{\partial\eta}
$$
and
$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial\xi}{\partial t}\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi} + \frac{\partial\eta}{\partial t}\frac{\partial}{\partial\eta} = c\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi} - c\frac{\partial}{\partial\eta}.
$$
Therefore, the second derivatives are
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} & = & \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi^2} + 2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} + \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\eta^2}\\
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2} & = & c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi^2} - 2c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} + c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\eta^2}
\end{alignat*}
Making the appropriate substitution, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi^2} - 2c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} + c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\eta^2} & = & c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi^2} + 2c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} + c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\eta^2}\\
4c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} & = & 0\\
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} & = & 0
\end{alignat*}Show that by integrating twice, once with respect to $\eta$ and once with respect to $\xi$, that the general form for $u$ is
\begin{alignat*}{3}
u(\xi,\eta) & = & F(\xi) + G(\eta)\\
u(x,t) & = & F(x + ct) + G(x - ct)
\end{alignat*}
where the forms $F$ and $G$ are arbitrary. This result lies at the heart of the method of characteristics for linear wave motion.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\iint u_{\xi\eta} d\eta d\xi & = & \iint 0 d\eta d\xi\\
\int u_{\xi} & = & \int f(\xi)\\
u(\xi,\eta) & = & F(\xi) + G(\eta)
\end{alignat*}
 
dwsmith said:
Given
$$
u(\xi,\eta) = F(\xi) + G(\eta)
$$
and
$$
\xi = x+ct\qquad\qquad \eta = x -ct.
$$

How do we get to $u(x,t) = F(x+ct) + G(x-ct)$?

I see that we can make the sub
$$
u(x+ct,x-ct) = F(x+ct) + G(x-ct)
$$
but how do I then get simply $u(x,t)$?

Hi dwsmith, :)

\(u(x+ct,x-ct)\) means that your function \(u\) depends on \(x+ct\) and \(x-ct\). But since \(c\) is a constant value that is same as saying that your function is dependent upon \(x\) and \(t\). So writing \(u(x,t)\) instead of \(u(x+ct,x-ct)\) is the same except the fact that \(u(x+ct,x-ct)\) gives you the additional detail that \(x+ct\) and \(x-ct\) appears explicitly in the expression of \(u\). What I am saying is when you write, \(u(\xi,\eta)=u(x+ct,x-ct)\) you know that the function \(u\) is something like,

\[u(x+ct,x-ct)=(x-ct)^2+\sqrt{x+ct}\]

Clearly the above function is a function of \(x\) and \(t\). So you can write, \(u(x,t)\) but then you are missing the detail that \(x+ct\) and \(x-ct\) could be separated and the function could be written as \(u(\xi,\eta)\). Hope my explanation helps. :)

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
dwsmith said:
I already solved that. I wondering how I get back to $u(x,t)$.
Here is where I am at

$$
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} = 0.
$$
Let's take the standard form of the wave equation $u_{tt} = c^2u_{xx}$.
Then by the chain rule
$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial\xi}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi} + \frac{\partial\eta}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial\eta} = \frac{\partial}{\partial\xi} + \frac{\partial}{\partial\eta}
$$
and
$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial\xi}{\partial t}\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi} + \frac{\partial\eta}{\partial t}\frac{\partial}{\partial\eta} = c\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi} - c\frac{\partial}{\partial\eta}.
$$
Therefore, the second derivatives are
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} & = & \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi^2} + 2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} + \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\eta^2}\\
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2} & = & c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi^2} - 2c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} + c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\eta^2}
\end{alignat*}
Making the appropriate substitution, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi^2} - 2c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} + c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\eta^2} & = & c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi^2} + 2c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} + c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\eta^2}\\
4c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} & = & 0\\
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\xi\partial\eta} & = & 0
\end{alignat*}Show that by integrating twice, once with respect to $\eta$ and once with respect to $\xi$, that the general form for $u$ is
\begin{alignat*}{3}
u(\xi,\eta) & = & F(\xi) + G(\eta)\\
u(x,t) & = & F(x + ct) + G(x - ct)
\end{alignat*}
where the forms $F$ and $G$ are arbitrary. This result lies at the heart of the method of characteristics for linear wave motion.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\iint u_{\xi\eta} d\eta d\xi & = & \iint 0 d\eta d\xi\\
\int u_{\xi} & = & \int f(\xi)\\
u(\xi,\eta) & = & F(\xi) + G(\eta)
\end{alignat*}
If you already knew about this then why did you post it in Pre-Calc?

Okay, I'm kind of reading this right out of my book, so I feel like I'm cheating. But we know that
u_{\xi \eta} = (u_{\xi})_{\eta} = 0
which implies that u_{\xi} is independent of \eta so
u_{\xi} = f'(\xi)

Thus
u(\xi, \eta) = \int f'(\xi)~d \xi + G(\eta) = F(\xi) + G(\eta)

then put back the original x, t.

I should note two things...first that u is assumed to be convex in either pair of variables. (I really don't know what that means.) And second, my source is "Partial Differential Equations", 4 ed. by Fritz John, section 4, pg 40.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
If you already knew about this then why did you post it in Pre-Calc?

Okay, I'm kind of reading this right out of my book, so I feel like I'm cheating. But we know that
u_{\xi \eta} = (u_{\xi})_{\eta} = 0
which implies that u_{\xi} is independent of \eta so
u_{\xi} = f'(\xi)

Thus
u(\xi, \eta) = \int f'(\xi)~d \xi + G(\eta) = F(\xi) + G(\eta)

then put back the original x, t.

I should note two things...first that u is assumed to be convex in either pair of variables. (I really don't know what that means.) And second, my source is "Partial Differential Equations", 4 ed. by Fritz John, section 4, pg 40.

-Dan

I put it in pre-calc since I was asking about change of variables not solving the problem (I had that under control). That is also why I didn't supply the details.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top