Chapman Kolmogorov Th. - generality?

  • Thread starter Stephen Tashi
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Kolmogorov
In summary, the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation is not valid for an arbitrary stochastic process, as stated in the current Wikipedia article on "Stochastic process". However, in the "Handbook of Stochastic Methods" by C.W. Gardiner, marginalization is used to prove the equation. However, Gardiner does not refer to this equation as the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation. Additionally, the Markov assumption allows for the dropping of a time dependence, resulting in the familiar form of the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation.
  • #1
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
7,861
1,600
Does the Chapman - Kolmogorov equation hold for an arbitrary stochastic process?

The current wikipedia article on "Stochastic process" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_process ) seems to say that the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation is not valid for an arbitrary stochastic process.

I say "seems to say" since I can't interpret what the article means by "same class" in the passage:

Note that the obvious compatibility condition, namely, that this marginal probability distribution be in the same class as the one derived from the full-blown stochastic process, is not a requirement. Such a condition only holds, for example, if the stochastic process is a Wiener process (in which case the marginals are all gaussian distributions of the exponential class) but not in general for all stochastic processes. When this condition is expressed in terms of probability densities, the result is called the Chapman–Kolmogorov equation.
 
  • #3
Whether the equation is true for an arbitrary process depends on what one calls "the Chapman-Kolmogorov Equation". In "Handbook Of Stochastic Methods" by C.W. Gardiner, second edition, pages 43-44, marginalization is a proof for the equation:

[tex] p(x_1,t_1) = \int dx_2 \ p(x_1,t_1; x_2, t_2) [/tex]

which corresponds to the equation in the current Wikipedia article given by:

[tex] p_{i_1,\ldots,i_{n-1}}(f_1,\ldots,f_{n-1})=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}p_{i_1,\ldots,i_n}(f_1,\ldots,f_n)\,df_n [/tex]

which that article calls "the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation".

However, Gardiner does not call that equation "the Chapman-Kolmogorov Equation".

Marginalization also proves the equation

[tex] p(x_1,t_1\ |\ x_3,t_3) = \int dx_2\ p(x_1,t_1; x_2,t_2|x_3,t_3) [/tex]
[tex] = \int dx_2\ p(x_1,t_1| x_2,t_2; x_3,t_3)\ p(x_2,t_2 | x_3,t_3) [/tex]

Gardiner says
This equation is also always valid. We now introduce the Markov assumption. If [itex] t_1 \ge t_2 \ge t_3 [/itex] we can drop the [itex] t_3 [/itex] dependence in the double conditioned probability and write

[tex] p(x_1,t_1 | x_3,t_3) = \int dx_2\ p(x_1,t_1| x_2,t_2) p(x_2,t_2| x_3,t_3) [/tex]

which is the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation.
 

FAQ: Chapman Kolmogorov Th. - generality?

1. What is the Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem and why is it important?

The Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem is a fundamental result in probability theory that relates the joint distribution of a stochastic process at different points in time. It states that the probability of a future event depends only on the current state of the process and not on the path it took to get there. This theorem is important because it allows us to make predictions about the future behavior of a stochastic process based on its current state, which has many applications in fields such as finance, physics, and engineering.

2. Can you explain the mathematical notation used in the Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem?

The Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem is often expressed using the notation P(Xn+1 ∈ A | X1 = x1, ..., Xn = xn) = P(Xn+1 ∈ A | Xn = xn), where Xn and Xn+1 represent the state of the process at two different points in time, and A is a set of possible outcomes. This notation simply means that the probability of the process being in set A at time n+1, given its state at time n, is equal to the probability of being in set A at time n+1, regardless of the process's previous states.

3. How does the Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem apply to Markov processes?

The Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem is often used in the context of Markov processes, which are stochastic processes where the future state of the process only depends on the current state and not on any previous states. This theorem allows us to break down the joint distribution of a Markov process into smaller, simpler conditional distributions, which makes it easier to analyze and make predictions about the process's behavior.

4. Are there any limitations to the Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem?

While the Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem is a powerful tool in probability theory, it does have some limitations. One limitation is that it only applies to processes that have a discrete state space, meaning that the possible states of the process are countable. Additionally, it assumes that the process is stationary, meaning that the probabilities of transitioning from one state to another do not change over time.

5. Can you give an example of how the Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem is used in real-life applications?

One example of how the Chapman Kolmogorov Theorem is used in real-life applications is in the field of finance. Stock prices are often modeled as stochastic processes, and the theorem allows us to make predictions about future stock prices based on their current values. This is important for investors who want to make informed decisions about buying and selling stocks. The theorem is also used in physics to model the behavior of particles and in engineering to predict the reliability of systems over time.

Similar threads

Back
Top