Charge of 2 conducting spheres separated by a distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the charge of two conducting spheres, one at a potential of 1500 V and the other at -1500 V, separated by 10.0 m. Initially, the charge on one sphere is calculated to be approximately 2.50×10−8 C, with a potential drop of 22.5 V at a distance of 10 m from the sphere. This drop is considered a small perturbation, allowing the assumption that the total potential can be approximated by adding this perturbation to the original 1500 V. The perturbation indicates that the influence of the second sphere is minimal, leading to a slight adjustment in the charge calculation to 2.54×10−8 C. The discussion highlights the relationship between potential, distance, and charge in electrostatics.
jolly_math
Messages
51
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Two identical conducting spheres of radius 15.0 cm are separated by a distance of 10.0 m. What is the charge on each sphere if the potential of one is +1500 V and the other is -1500 V? Take V = 0 at infinity.
Relevant Equations
V = E∆s
V = kq/r
First assuming only one sphere at a potential of 1500 V, the charge would be q = 4πεrV = 4π(8.85×10
−12C2/N · m)(0.150 m)(1500 V) = 2.50×10−8C.
The potential from the sphere at a distance of 10.0 m would be V =(1500V)(0.150m)/(10.0m) =22.5V.

I don't understand the reasoning of the following:

This is small compared to 1500V, so we will treat it as a perturbation. This means that we can assume that the spheres have charges of
q = 4πεrV = 4π(8.85×10−12C2/N · m)(0.150 m)(1500 V + 22.5 V) = 2.54×10−8C.

What does the perturbation refer to, and how is 1500 V + 22.5 V related to the specific distance 0.150 m? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jolly_math said:
Homework Statement:: Two identical conducting spheres of radius 15.0 cm are separated by a distance of 10.0 m. What is the charge on each sphere if the potential of one is +1500 V and the other is -1500 V? Take V = 0 at infinity.
Relevant Equations:: V = E∆s
V = kq/r

First assuming only one sphere at a potential of 1500 V, the charge would be q = 4πεrV = 4π(8.85×10
−12C2/N · m)(0.150 m)(1500 V) = 2.50×10−8C.
The potential from the sphere at a distance of 10.0 m would be V =(1500V)(0.150m)/(10.0m) =22.5V.

I don't understand the reasoning of the following:

This is small compared to 1500V, so we will treat it as a perturbation. This means that we can assume that the spheres have charges of
q = 4πεrV = 4π(8.85×10−12C2/N · m)(0.150 m)(1500 V + 22.5 V) = 2.54×10−8C.

What does the perturbation refer to, and how is 1500 V + 22.5 V related to the specific distance 0.150 m? Thank you.
It just means that if the influence of the far sphere only drops the potential by 22.5/1500=1.5% then we can restore it to 1500V, near enough, by increasing both charges by 1.5%.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top