Check Out This Incredible Math Trick

  • Thread starter Thread starter Econometricia
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a math trick involving the creation of a shape that resembles a rectangle. It highlights that for the shape to be a true rectangle, the slopes of the triangles involved must be equal, which they are not in this case. The slopes of the red and green triangles (3/8) differ from the slopes of the other shapes (2/5), confirming that the shape cannot be classified as a rectangle. Participants also explore the area of a triangle within the shape, questioning its vertices and area calculations. Ultimately, the trick is entertaining but mathematically flawed.
Econometricia
33
0
Sorry if this has been posted. Thought it was cool!
http://www.wimp.com/crazymath/
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Bit different version of a old rube.

For the created shape to be a rectangle you need to have the slopes of the red and green triangles (3/8) be equal to the slope of the angle of the other 2 shapes (2/5).

Since .4 <> .375 that is not a rectangle and you cannot get the area by multiplying sides.
 


But still amusing!
 


Integral said:
Bit different version of a old rube.

For the created shape to be a rectangle you need to have the slopes of the red and green triangles (3/8) be equal to the slope of the angle of the other 2 shapes (2/5).

Since .4 <> .375 that is not a rectangle and you cannot get the area by multiplying sides.

So is it safe to say that in the 5x13 "rectangle", there is a triangle of area ONE unit with a vertex in the top right corner and two vertices near the bottom left corner?

edit...
No, that can't be right, since the slope changes from 3/8 to 2/5...
So vertices:
1) top right corner (13, 5)
2) at "point" (5,2)
3) bottom left corner (0,0)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation has no solutions with positive integers if It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top