MHB Checking if f(x)=x^3 is Monotonic: No Derivatives Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
To determine if the function f(x) = x^3 is monotonic without using derivatives, one can apply the definition of monotonicity. By evaluating the expression f(x+h) - f(x) for a positive real number h, if the result is greater than or equal to zero, the function is monotonically increasing. Conversely, if the result is less than or equal to zero, the function is monotonically decreasing. This approach effectively assesses the function's behavior across intervals. Thus, f(x) = x^3 can be analyzed for monotonicity using this method.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I want to check if

f(x)=x^3 is monotonically increasing or monotonically decreasing or not monotonic at all.

How do I do that, without using derivatives yet ?

Thanks !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You use the definition.
 
Let $h$ be some positive real number, then if:

$$f(x+h)-f(x)\ge0$$ the function is monotically increasing or if:

$$f(x+h)-f(x)\le0$$ the function is monotically decreasing.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top