- #36
- 8,158
- 1,844
I hadn't seen this exchange yet.
There seems to be significant interest in the President's involvement, and a greater effort to deny that information. Do I detect a non-denial denial?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20024553/page/6/MR. RUSSERT: Let’s go to Alberto Gonzales. To give you a flavor of it, this is an exchange that he had with New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer about why he went to a hospital room, when he was counselor to the president, to talk to the attorney general. Let’s watch.
(Videotape, Tuesday)
SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): Did the president ask you to go?
ATT’Y GEN. ALBERTO GONZALES: We were there on behalf of the president of the United States.
SEN. SCHUMER: I didn’t ask you that.
ATT’Y GEN. GONZALES: I can’t...
SEN. SCHUMER: Did the president ask you to go?
ATT’Y GEN. GONZALES: Senator, we were there on behalf of the president of the United States.
SEN. SCHUMER: Why can’t you answer that question?
ATT’Y GEN. GONZALES: That’s the answer that I can give you, senator.
SEN. SCHUMER: Well, can you explain to me why you can’t answer it directly?
ATT’Y GEN. GONZALES: Senator, again, we were there on, on an important program for this president on behalf of the president of the United States.
There seems to be significant interest in the President's involvement, and a greater effort to deny that information. Do I detect a non-denial denial?