Chiral theories and matter gauges

[sirchasm]

Is it true that classical theories tend to treat matter 'in the limit' of large N, or it encodes matter in $$N_A$$ as $$N_A(m_e,e)$$ say, and chiral theories need to include $$\hbar$$ which classicality sees as $$\{G(h),c\}$$?

We use 'mass-free' theories that treat charge and spin momentum in circuits = manifolds with linear/nonlinear operators.
Algebraically these manifolds can operate at linear (<<nonlinear) limits that treat charge algebraically and do not rotate spin or they operate in a N(e + s) domain that keeps N(s) at 0.

We need theories that include a mass-spin term?

 

[sirchasm]

that N(e + s) thing should be able to explain how N gauges charge e (in my notation), and spin-potential s, in a mass-free index; When we use much smaller N than $$N_A\,$$ of charge and spin,we see distributed phase momenta = discrete products.

We haven't been able to connect the enumerable side of Avogadro's number to the way spin and charge evolve over the 'mass-field', or extend algebraically.

 

[Entropia]

I can say that the concepts of chiral theories and matter gauges are complex and require a deep understanding of theoretical physics. However, I will try to provide a response to the content given.

Firstly, it is true that classical theories tend to treat matter in the limit of large N, where N represents the number of particles or entities. This is because classical theories are based on deterministic principles and do not take into account the quantum nature of matter. On the other hand, chiral theories, which are based on the principles of quantum mechanics, require the inclusion of Planck's constant, denoted by \hbar, in their equations. This is because chiral theories deal with the spin of particles, which is a quantum property that is not present in classical theories.

Furthermore, classical theories often encode matter in terms of N_A, which represents Avogadro's number, and the mass and charge of a single particle, denoted by m_e and e respectively. This approach is suitable for macroscopic systems where the number of particles is large and their individual properties can be averaged out. However, in chiral theories, the inclusion of \hbar is necessary to accurately describe the behavior of individual particles, which is important at the quantum level.

Moreover, the concept of 'mass-free' theories is not entirely accurate. All particles have mass, and it is a fundamental property that cannot be ignored. In fact, the inclusion of mass-spin terms is crucial in theories that deal with the behavior of particles in circuits or manifolds. These theories use linear and nonlinear operators to describe the movement of particles, and the inclusion of mass-spin terms is necessary to accurately describe their behavior.

In conclusion, both classical and chiral theories have their own limitations and strengths. While classical theories are suitable for macroscopic systems, chiral theories are necessary for understanding the behavior of particles at the quantum level. The inclusion of \hbar and mass-spin terms is essential in chiral theories, as they accurately describe the behavior of individual particles in circuits or manifolds.