- #1
MathewsMD
- 433
- 7
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=479376
Looking at the above link, I was wondering how he found that electric field lost by removing the circular area from the sheet was proportional to ## \frac {z}{(z^2 + r^2)^{1/2}} ##? Why is it not just the ##πr^2##? I am fairly new to Gauss's Law and having a bit of trouble understanding what the formula: ## E = \frac {σ}{2ε} ## and if anyone could provide an explanation for the equation and why the problem in the link was solved with the given method, that would be great!
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elesht.html
Looking at this link, I am confused on where the 2 comes from in the denominator...is it because you are considering both sides of the surface?
To clarify, the constant ε is constant in any setting (ex. vacuum, 0K, in liquids, etc.) and it describes how an electric field permeates the space, right? Once again, I am just having a bit of trouble understanding how this formula and constant are significant, especially since I have yet to fully understand Gauss's Law, so any explanation would be amazing!
Looking at the above link, I was wondering how he found that electric field lost by removing the circular area from the sheet was proportional to ## \frac {z}{(z^2 + r^2)^{1/2}} ##? Why is it not just the ##πr^2##? I am fairly new to Gauss's Law and having a bit of trouble understanding what the formula: ## E = \frac {σ}{2ε} ## and if anyone could provide an explanation for the equation and why the problem in the link was solved with the given method, that would be great!
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elesht.html
Looking at this link, I am confused on where the 2 comes from in the denominator...is it because you are considering both sides of the surface?
To clarify, the constant ε is constant in any setting (ex. vacuum, 0K, in liquids, etc.) and it describes how an electric field permeates the space, right? Once again, I am just having a bit of trouble understanding how this formula and constant are significant, especially since I have yet to fully understand Gauss's Law, so any explanation would be amazing!