- #1
The Head
- 144
- 2
- TL;DR Summary
- Interpreting: (∃x)(∀y) (Fyx ⊃ Fyy)
I've been reading a logic book and saw the logical statement below and have been trying to consider its meaning:
(∃x)(∀y) (Fyx ⊃ Fyy)
I keep going back and forth whether this statement is implying:
a) For all things, if they do F to x, then they do F to themselves
-OR-
b) If there's some x that all things do F to, they all do F to themselves
Appreciate any clarification. The conditional is just throwing me off because I'm not sure if the antecedent is guarantees everything is doing an action to some x or if it's just "for each thing" that is doing an action to x.
(∃x)(∀y) (Fyx ⊃ Fyy)
I keep going back and forth whether this statement is implying:
a) For all things, if they do F to x, then they do F to themselves
-OR-
b) If there's some x that all things do F to, they all do F to themselves
Appreciate any clarification. The conditional is just throwing me off because I'm not sure if the antecedent is guarantees everything is doing an action to some x or if it's just "for each thing" that is doing an action to x.