Classical counterpart of the quantum |nlm> states

In summary, the classical counterparts of the quantum |nlm> states in an isotropic potential are classical trajectories with the same angular momentum and energy as the quantum state. This question is not trivial and can be further explained by understanding that a classical trajectory is a superposition of states with different n, l, and m, with average values for energy, angular momentum, and projection.
  • #1
wdlang
307
0
what are the classical counterparts of the quantum |nlm> states?

in a isotropic potential.

i am reading some books on Redberg atoms and i find this question not so trivial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
wdlang said:
what are the classical counterparts of the quantum |nlm> states?

in a isotropic potential.

i am reading some books on Redberg atoms and i find this question not so trivial.

Roughly speaking, a classical trajectory with the same (big) angular momentum L = l and the same (big) energy E = E_n corresponds to the quantum state |nlm> with the projection m = l=L.

Stricltly speaking, a classical trajectory is a superposition of the states |nlm> with different n, l, and the projections m with E=<E_n>, L = <l>, and the average value of <m>=L.


Bob.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


The classical counterparts of the quantum |nlm> states are known as the Bohr-Sommerfeld states. These states are characterized by the same quantum numbers as the corresponding quantum states, but they describe the motion of a classical particle in an isotropic potential. In other words, they represent the allowed orbits of a classical particle around the nucleus of an atom in an isotropic potential.

The Bohr-Sommerfeld states were originally proposed by Niels Bohr and Arnold Sommerfeld in the early 20th century as a way to bridge the gap between classical and quantum mechanics. They are based on the assumption that the angular momentum of the particle is quantized, just like in quantum mechanics.

One of the key differences between the classical and quantum states is that in the classical states, the energy levels are continuous, while in the quantum states they are discrete. This is due to the wave-like nature of quantum particles, which allows them to only occupy certain energy levels.

Furthermore, the classical states also do not take into account the uncertainty principle, which is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics that states that the position and momentum of a particle cannot be known simultaneously with absolute certainty.

Overall, the classical counterparts of the quantum |nlm> states provide a useful tool for understanding the behavior of atoms in an isotropic potential, but they do not fully capture the complexities of quantum mechanics.
 

FAQ: Classical counterpart of the quantum |nlm> states

What is the classical counterpart of quantum |nlm> states?

The classical counterpart of quantum |nlm> states are the energy levels and orbits of an atom or molecule in classical mechanics. These states can be described by the quantum numbers n, l, and m, which represent the principal quantum number, orbital angular momentum quantum number, and magnetic quantum number, respectively.

How are the quantum |nlm> states related to classical mechanics?

The quantum |nlm> states are related to classical mechanics through the correspondence principle, which states that in the limit of large quantum numbers, the behavior of quantum systems should approach that of classical systems. This means that the energy levels and orbits of an atom or molecule in quantum mechanics should match those predicted by classical mechanics in the appropriate limit.

What is the significance of the quantum numbers n, l, and m in the classical counterpart of quantum |nlm> states?

The quantum numbers n, l, and m have specific physical meanings in the classical counterpart of quantum |nlm> states. The principal quantum number n determines the size and energy of the orbit, the orbital angular momentum quantum number l determines the shape of the orbit, and the magnetic quantum number m determines the orientation of the orbit in space.

Can classical mechanics fully describe the behavior of quantum |nlm> states?

No, classical mechanics cannot fully describe the behavior of quantum |nlm> states. While classical mechanics can accurately predict the behavior of large quantum systems, it fails to explain the behavior of tiny particles such as electrons. Quantum mechanics is necessary to fully understand and describe the behavior of quantum systems.

How are the classical counterpart of quantum |nlm> states used in practical applications?

The classical counterpart of quantum |nlm> states have many practical applications, such as in spectroscopy and quantum chemistry. By understanding the energy levels and orbits of atoms and molecules, scientists can analyze the absorption and emission spectra of different substances and use this information to identify and study their chemical properties.

Back
Top