Closest distance of approach between 2 charged particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the closest distance of approach between two charged particles using energy conservation principles. The initial kinetic energy of the particles is equated to their potential energy, leading to a derived equation for distance. The user initially miscalculated the closest distance, believing it to be incorrect compared to a video reference. After realizing the need for a more accurate approach, they successfully applied conservation of energy to find the correct solution. The final result indicates that the closest distance of approach is half the initial distance, confirming the calculations.
Heisenberg7
Messages
101
Reaction score
18
Homework Statement
Two identical point charges are moving in free space, when they are 60 cm apart, their velocities are equal in magnitude and make angles of 45 degrees from the line joining them as shown in the figure. If at this instant their total kinetic energy is equal to their potential energy, what will be the distance of closest approach between them? (Source: YouTube video; Name: Electrostatics | Advanced Problem | Closest Distance of Approach Between Two Charged particles)
Relevant Equations
$$v_f = v_i - at$$
$$s = v_ot - \frac {at^2} 2$$
$$F = ma$$
1719764874931.png

A few hours ago, I tried solving this problem and I'm still not quite sure if I've made a mistake somewhere or perhaps the guy in the video is wrong? Anyway, here's my solution:

In the problem we're given that the total kinetic energy of of these 2 charges at this instant(look at the picture) is equal to their potential energy, thus we can write:$$\sum E_k=Ep$$ $$2 \frac {mv_o^2} 2 =k \frac {q^2} r$$ Simplifying this we get $$mv_o^2 = k \frac {q^2} r , (1)$$

The speed of one particle in the y direction is going to stay constant during the whole interaction because the force on the particles does work only in the x direction. So we can write $$v_y=v_{oy}=v_o \cos ⁡45^{\circ}=v_o \frac {\sqrt{2}}2$$ Now the x direction. The initial velocity in the x direction is equal to the initial velocity in the y direction(magnitude). Both of these particles are going to decelerate due to the electrostatic force acting on both particles $$F_e=k \frac {q^2} {r^2}$$ By the second Newton's law, we get that the acceleration is, $$a=k\frac {q^2} {mr^2}$$ When the magnitude of velocities of these 2 particles reaches zero, we get the closest distance of approach. By plugging that into the kinematics equation we get, ##v_i=at##, or $$v_{ox}=at \iff v_o \frac {\sqrt{2}} 2=at \iff v_o \frac {\sqrt{2}} 2=k\frac {q^2} {mr^2} t$$ $$\iff t = \frac {\sqrt{2}} 2 \frac{v_o m r^2} {kq^2}$$Using the second kinematics equation we will get the distance covered by one of the particles, $$s=v_{ox}t−\frac {at^2} 2$$, or $$s=\frac{\sqrt{2}} 2 v_o t−\frac {at^2} 2$$ Plugging in for ##t## and ##a## and simplifying we get $$s=\frac{1} 2 \frac {v_o^2mr^2}{kq^2}−\frac {1} 4 \frac {v_o^2mr^2} {kq^2}$$ From this we get $$s=\frac {1} 4 \frac {mv_o^2 r^2}{kq^2}$$ Now comes the equation we derived above (1). By substituting, we get $$s=\frac {1} 4 \frac {k \frac {q^2} {r} r^2} {kq^2}$$ Or $$s=\frac{1} 4 r$$ Both particles are going to travel the same distance thus the closest distance of approach is going to be $$r_2=r−2s \iff r_2=r−2\frac {1} 4 r \iff r_2=r−\frac {1} 2 r \iff r_2=\frac {1} 2 r \iff r_ 2=\frac {1} 2 60cm \iff r_2=30cm$$ In the video the guy somehow got $$r_2=\frac {2} 3 r$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There was a glitch. It will take me some time to convert this back to latex. I refreshed the page and everything crashed.
 
You are using the kinematic equations for constant acceleration. Is the acceleration constant?
 
kuruman said:
You using the kinematic equations for constant acceleration. Is the acceleration constant?
Ah, I completely overlooked that. I guess I'll have to integrate or perhaps I could try setting up an equation for conservation of energy since net external force is 0. I would really like to try integrating this, but I haven't done much calculus. Would an integral in this problem be hard to solve?
 
What is "this" that you want to integrate and why? Just equate the mechanical energy at the moment shown in the figure with the mechanical energy at the moment of closest approach.
 
  • Like
Likes Heisenberg7
kuruman said:
What is "this" that you want to integrate and why? Just equate the mechanical energy at the moment shown in the figure with the mechanical energy at the moment of closest approach.
Never mind. I got the solution using conservation of energy. Thank you for pointing out my mistake!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and kuruman
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top