CMB, The Horizon Problem and a comment on BH's

In summary: Thanks for the question.What do you mean by remnant radiation? By definition, isn't CMB some remnant radiation that became separated from matter at a specific, early point in the universe's history?
  • #36
superg33k said:
Excellent. Thanks for going through this all with me. I'm happy to say the horizon problem makes sense.
Great! Happy to help.
Additionally I never realized that non-infamitory models required a constant rate of expansion of the scale factor, which makes sense also.
I hope I didn't say this! By definition, non-inflationary spacetimes need only satisfy [itex]\ddot{a}<0[/itex]. The scale factor in non-inflationary models is not necessarily constant -- for example, in a radiation dominated universe [itex]a(t) \sim t^{1/2}[/itex], whereas in a matter dominated one [itex]a(t) \sim t^{2/3}[/itex].
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #37
bapowell said:
I hope I didn't say this!

Yep, your right, you didn't. An inequality became an equality in my head.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
103
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top