Coaxial semi-infinite solenoid and superconducting disc

In summary, the study of a coaxial semi-infinite solenoid coupled with a superconducting disc explores the electromagnetic interactions and field distributions in this unique configuration. The solenoid generates a magnetic field, while the superconducting disc exhibits properties such as the Meissner effect, leading to the expulsion of magnetic fields. The analysis covers the effects of the solenoid's geometry and current on the superconducting state, revealing insights into magnetic shielding and field penetration depth, which are crucial for applications in superconducting technologies and magnetic field manipulation.
  • #36
According to Gauss's Theorem for the magnetic field, we have that the divergence of [tex]\displaystyle \textbf{B}[/tex] is equal to [tex]0[/tex]: the total magnetic field flux through a closed surface non-secanting the solenoid is zero. Applying Gauss's Theorem to a spherical collinear distribution to the solenoid with radius [tex]R[/tex] and centered on the center of the base of the multiple-winding coil, the total magnetic field across that surface is given by the difference between the flux [tex]\displaystyle \Phi_0 = \Phi_{inside}[/tex] of the magnetic field [tex]\displaystyle B_0 = B_{inside} = \mu_0 nI[/tex] at the centre of the sphere-solenoid and the flux [tex]\Phi_R[/tex] of the radial magnetic field [tex]B_R[/tex] through the coil.
The flux [tex]\Phi_0[/tex] is given by: [tex]\displaystyle \Phi_0 = B_0 S_{circle}[/tex], where [tex]\displaystyle S_{circle} = \pi r^2[/tex] is the surface of the superconducting loop. So: [tex]\displaystyle \Phi_0 = \mu_0 n \pi I r^2[/tex].
The flux [tex]\Phi_R[/tex] is given by: [tex]\displaystyle \Phi_R = B_R S_{sphere}[/tex], where [tex]\displaystyle S_{sphere} = 4 \pi R^2[/tex] is the surface of the sphere-solenoid. So: [tex]\displaystyle \Phi_R = B_R \cdot 4 \pi R^2[/tex].

So, we obtain:
[tex]\displaystyle \nabla \cdot \textbf{B}= 0[/tex] [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\displaystyle \Phi_{tot} = 0[/tex] [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\displaystyle \Phi_0 - \Phi_R = 0[/tex] [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\displaystyle \Phi_0 = \Phi_R[/tex] [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\displaystyle \mu_0 n \pi I r^2 = B_R \cdot 4 \pi R^2[/tex] [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\displaystyle \boxed{B_R = \frac{\mu_0 n I r^2}{4 R^2}}[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
This equation for the flux $$\displaystyle \Phi_R = B_R 4\pi R^2$$ is valid only if ##B_R## constant everywhere on the surface of the sphere. That is clearly not the case here.
Hak said:
the total magnetic field flux through a closed surface non-secanting the solenoid is zero
The magnetic flux through any closed surface is zero regardless of whether you have a solenoid or where the surface is relative to it. That comes from the divergence of B being equal to zero. The flux that goes in must come out. The situation is different if you have an open surface, but you didn't specify one here. So ##\Phi_R=0.##

I do not believe that your arguments are correct.
 
  • #38
kuruman said:
This equation for the flux $$\displaystyle \Phi_R = B_R 4\pi R^2$$ is valid only if ##B_R## constant everywhere on the surface of the sphere. That is clearly not the case here.

The magnetic flux through any closed surface is zero regardless of whether you have a solenoid or where the surface is relative to it. That comes the divergence of B being equal to zero. The flux the goes in must come out. The situation is different if you have an open surface, but you didn't specify one here. So ##\Phi_R=0.##

I do not believe that your arguments are correct.

You are absolutely right, but the good thing is that this is also the official solution. This really is a dilemma.
 
  • #39
There is no dilemma. The official solution is incorrect. I suggest that you find another source of challenging problems.
 
  • #40
Thank you, you have opened my eyes. It's not my fault, I thought Russian Olympiads were a good source of intriguing problems. If the official solutions are wrong, I would say it is very, very bad. Thank you for everything.
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
701
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
836
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top