Coefficient of kinetic friction and acceleration

AI Thread Summary
A 3.00 kg block slides down a 30-degree ramp, covering 2.00 m in 1.20 seconds, resulting in an acceleration of 1.78 m/s². To find the coefficient of kinetic friction, the normal force is calculated as 25.5 N using mgcos30. The frictional force needs to be determined, and it is essential to set up a free body diagram to visualize the forces acting on the block. The relationship between the frictional force and the normal force is given by Fk = uFn, where u is the coefficient of kinetic friction. The difference between the calculated acceleration and the expected acceleration without friction can help find the frictional force and ultimately the coefficient of friction.
Leid_X09
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 3.00 kg block starts from rest and moves down a ramp on an incline of 30 degrees. If it makes it 2.00 m down the incline in 1.20 s, then:

a) what is the acceleration of the block?

This answer I got using dX=Vot + 1/2at^2. The answer is 1.78 m/s^2.

b) the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the ramp.

Here is where I run into problems. n can be found using mgcos30 (29.4cos30) which gives you n = 25.5. But I'm confused on how to determine the frictional force. I know it can't be -fk = ma, since the object is in moving so fk should be less than ma. How can I set this equation up? What variable am I not looking at? I know that uk = Fk/n, but how do I get Fk?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first step is going to be setting up a free body diagram. After that, keep in mind that Fk= uFn, where u= u(k)

Use Ef(x)=ma(x). you already determined the x-accel in the first part.

So from what you said, you thought it was -Fk=ma(x). So -uFn=ma(x), = -u=Ma(x)/Fn, wouldn't that value be smaller than ma?

The only problem now seems to be your negative value of u... see where you went wrong?
 
Last edited:
I think you need to recalculate your acceleration. That doesn't look right.

Once you have your acceleration, what should your acceleration have been if it were frictionless? You know the component of gravity down the incline. And you have an answer for the acceleration with friction, so the difference in acceleration must be due to the frictional force acting on the mass.

Once you have that force, you have the normal component of gravity to the incline accounting for that force and the ratio is called the coefficient of friction.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top