Coil Winding Orientation and Pattern....

In summary: It's not so simple as that. While the voltage drop across a turn is the same for any winding, the current through a turn will be different. The current through a turn is determined by the voltage drop across the turn, the resistance of the wire, and the amount of current flow. What this means is that the current through a turn will be higher when the winding is configured in a particular way. In summary, while the voltage drop across a turn is the same for any winding, the current through a turn will be higher when the winding is configured in a particular way. This is due to the increased voltage drop across the turn, the resistance of the wire, and the amount of current flow. So, while coil
  • #1
shintashi
117
1
OK, so imagine you have a wire coiling over itself, in a near concentric spiral. When you get to the outer most edge, such as 10 or 100 wrappings depending on thickness, you then bend the wire so it's one diameter of the wire over and then start spiraling inward, till you get to the smallest diameter, then bend again, spiral the coil back to the largest diameter, and repeat this sequence.

While the wrapping style of this coil configuration is very different from the standard spool, of slinky one wrap along a parallel line slowly working left, then stopping, followed by wrapping it slowly right, then reversing, until the total wrappings are complete,

I really want to know if the magnetic field properties are different between these two? Do the magnetic fields bulge out more in method one, or do they have different properties than method 2? Method 2 is the standard method.

Essentially, while the amount of magnetic wire is the same, the electricity is pulsing in and out, and gradually working left to right,

while in method 2, the electricity appears to pulse left to right, while gradually working from into out.

So does coil configuration really matter? After all, the left hand rule says the direction of the magnetic effect, such as for a solenoid, is going to stay the same if both are wrapped in the same direction.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
shintashi said:
OK, so imagine you have a wire coiling over itself, in a near concentric spiral. When you get to the outer most edge, such as 10 or 100 wrappings depending on thickness, you then bend the wire so it's one diameter of the wire over and then start spiraling inward, till you get to the smallest diameter, then bend again, spiral the coil back to the largest diameter, and repeat this sequence.

While the wrapping style of this coil configuration is very different from the standard spool, of slinky one wrap along a parallel line slowly working left, then stopping, followed by wrapping it slowly right, then reversing, until the total wrappings are complete,

I really want to know if the magnetic field properties are different between these two? Do the magnetic fields bulge out more in method one, or do they have different properties than method 2? Method 2 is the standard method.

Essentially, while the amount of magnetic wire is the same, the electricity is pulsing in and out, and gradually working left to right,

while in method 2, the electricity appears to pulse left to right, while gradually working from into out.

So does coil configuration really matter? After all, the left hand rule says the direction of the magnetic effect, such as for a solenoid, is going to stay the same if both are wrapped in the same direction.
You have the same number of Amp-Turns, so you should get the same magenetizing inductance Lm, IMO. But your parasitics will be quite different, with a higher leakage inductance Lk and parasitic capacitance Cww. Can you say why Lk and Cww will go up with this winding technique? :smile:
 
  • #3
0028.png


0086.png


0114.png


here's 3 crude Images to explain what I mean by method 1. Each coil connects to the second coil, but they swap connecting points from inside to outside to inside repeatedly from one disk to the next.
 
  • #4
I do not understand what Lk and Cww means so i have no idea if they will go up. I was wondering though if there were any pros to match whatever cons the alternative coiling method might have, and how the magnetic field lines would look different. :)
 
  • #5
shintashi said:
I do not understand what Lk and Cww means so i have no idea if they will go up. I was wondering though if there were any pros to match whatever cons the alternative coiling method might have, and how the magnetic field lines would look different. :)
I don't see any pros offhand, and the higher Lk and Cww are definitely bad things.

The reason they go up is that each winding is adjacent to a winding that is "far away" from its neighbors, so the voltage difference seen between side-to-side windings is larger, which increases the effective winding-to-winding capacitance, Cww. And the flux linkage is worse because of the same reason, so Lk goes up.
 
  • #6
shintashi said:
So does coil configuration really matter?
If you are winding an electromagnet that will be operated on DC, then each turn of the winding will carry the same current. It is the distribution of all those single turns in space and about the core that determines the magnetic field. For DC, winding configuration does not change the magnetic field.

There is a voltage drop across each turn and each layer due to the resistance of the wire. The wire is insulated. Voltage has no effect on the magnetic field. But the order of winding the coil determines which turns are adjacent to which other turns. That has insulation implications. It is normal to wind a coil so as to keep difference voltages between near windings to a minimum as that will reduce the volume of insulation required. More insulation would reduce the space for copper so the resistive losses would increase, or the outer size of the winding might increase, resulting in changes to the magnetic field.

The implications of coil winding configuration become more important for AC excitation. As the frequency rises there are many effects that start to come into play. When the total length of wire in the winding approaches one tenth of a wavelength the coil may need to be treated more like a transmission line than an inductor.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

FAQ: Coil Winding Orientation and Pattern....

1. What is the purpose of coil winding orientation and pattern?

The purpose of coil winding orientation and pattern is to create a specific magnetic field within the coil, which is essential for the proper functioning of many electronic devices.

2. How does coil winding orientation affect the performance of a coil?

The orientation of the coil winding determines the direction and strength of the magnetic field produced. This can impact the efficiency, sensitivity, and overall performance of the coil in various applications.

3. What are the different types of coil winding patterns?

The most common types of coil winding patterns are concentric, spiral, and random. Concentric winding consists of multiple layers of wire wound in a circular pattern. Spiral winding involves a single wire being wrapped around a center core in a spiral pattern. Random winding, also known as helical winding, involves a mixture of both concentric and spiral winding techniques.

4. How do you determine the best coil winding orientation and pattern for a specific application?

The best coil winding orientation and pattern for a specific application depends on factors such as the desired magnetic field strength and direction, the type of core material used, and the overall design and purpose of the device. It is important to carefully consider these factors and conduct thorough testing to determine the optimal coil winding configuration.

5. Can coil winding orientation and pattern be changed after the coil is already wound?

In some cases, it is possible to change the orientation and pattern of a coil after it has been wound. This can be done by rewinding the coil in the desired configuration. However, this process can be time-consuming and may not always be feasible depending on the design of the coil and the materials used.

Back
Top