Plano-Convex Lenses: Collimating Light w/ 2m Diam. at 30m Dist.

  • Thread starter Thread starter gapesteguia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
To collimate light from a standard 5mm LED to achieve a 2-meter diameter circle at a distance of 30 meters, a plano-convex lens with a minimum focal length of approximately 75mm is recommended. The LED should be positioned slightly beyond the focal length of the lens to achieve optimal collimation. A longer focal length will improve beam collimation and reduce divergence, while a larger lens diameter will enhance light capture and minimize diffraction. The LED's active area may be smaller than its package size, affecting the collimation quality. For better results, consider using two lenses or modifying the LED to improve its light emission characteristics.
gapesteguia
2
0
I have a basic question about plano-convex lenses. suppose that I want to collimate the bean angle produced by a led (standard 5 mm leds). I want to obtain a circle diameter of 2 meters measured to 30 meters of distance. Suppose I have a wall to 30 meters of distance and I want to obtain a bean of 2 meters aprox. Which focal length should I use ? and what distance should be between the led (light source) and the plane side of the lens?


Thank you
German
 
Science news on Phys.org
Your image distance is infinite if the beam is collimated, so to first order you put the LED at a distance f=focal length away from the lens. It doesn't matter what f actually is as long as the object distance is equal to f. How well-collimated you can make the beam in practice depends on the lens and on the coherence of the light source.
 
The longer focal length you use, generally the better collimation that can be
achieved i.e. lower divergence of the light rays. Also the larger the diameter of
the lens, the better (lower) your diffraction limited beam divergence angle will be.

Keep in mind that the 5mm led may have a package diameter of 5mm, though the
active area that emits 90% of the light may be significantly smaller, and often
it's a ring-shape or some other kind of non-uniform geometry.

Anyway here's some rough data about the kind of performance and optical
system that (at a minimum) you're seeking.

atan(2m/30m) = 3.81 degree divergence.

2m/5mm = 400 = magnification of a 5mm diameter object projected onto a 2m width.

Where
p = distance from the lens to the object which in this case is the projected image of the source LED.
i = distance from the lens to the image of the object which in this case is the source LED
f = focal length of the lens.


The thin lens formula for a converging lens is:
1/p + 1/i = 1/f.

And the magnification is:
i/p.

For p/i = 400, and p=30m, i = 30000mm/400 = 75mm
1/p + 1/i = 1/f, so 1/30000mm + 1/75mm = 1/f = 1/74.8mm,
so f = 74.8mm.

So you'll place the LED slightly past the focal length of the PCX
lens, and the minimum focal length of the lens should be 75mm,
with greater FL giving better (narrower) best divergence.

The diameter of the lens should be such that it intercepts
most of your LED's light when the LED is positioned just beyond
the FL of the lens, at least if you're concerned about having
a maximum brightness projected spot.

So of course the wider the beam divergence angle from your LED's lens,
the wider you'd be advised to make your PCX lens' diameter.

You can make a better collimator with two lenses than you can with
one, however, but you can achieve similar results to what you've
described with one not-so-uncommon lens and a good ultra bright LED,
e.g. a few candelas, preferably one with a high candelas/steradian
figure and narrow beam angle.
 
Excellent explanation. It's very useful for me. Thanks.

xez said:
The longer focal length you use, generally the better collimation that can be
achieved i.e. lower divergence of the light rays. Also the larger the diameter of
the lens, the better (lower) your diffraction limited beam divergence angle will be.

Keep in mind that the 5mm led may have a package diameter of 5mm, though the
active area that emits 90% of the light may be significantly smaller, and often
it's a ring-shape or some other kind of non-uniform geometry.

Anyway here's some rough data about the kind of performance and optical
system that (at a minimum) you're seeking.

atan(2m/30m) = 3.81 degree divergence.

2m/5mm = 400 = magnification of a 5mm diameter object projected onto a 2m width.

Where
p = distance from the lens to the object which in this case is the projected image of the source LED.
i = distance from the lens to the image of the object which in this case is the source LED
f = focal length of the lens.


The thin lens formula for a converging lens is:
1/p + 1/i = 1/f.

And the magnification is:
i/p.

For p/i = 400, and p=30m, i = 30000mm/400 = 75mm
1/p + 1/i = 1/f, so 1/30000mm + 1/75mm = 1/f = 1/74.8mm,
so f = 74.8mm.

So you'll place the LED slightly past the focal length of the PCX
lens, and the minimum focal length of the lens should be 75mm,
with greater FL giving better (narrower) best divergence.

The diameter of the lens should be such that it intercepts
most of your LED's light when the LED is positioned just beyond
the FL of the lens, at least if you're concerned about having
a maximum brightness projected spot.

So of course the wider the beam divergence angle from your LED's lens,
the wider you'd be advised to make your PCX lens' diameter.

You can make a better collimator with two lenses than you can with
one, however, but you can achieve similar results to what you've
described with one not-so-uncommon lens and a good ultra bright LED,
e.g. a few candelas, preferably one with a high candelas/steradian
figure and narrow beam angle.
 
If you want uniform illumination LEDs are very poor sources.
The built-in round lens is a problem as is the structure of the LED junction istself.
A quick improvement is to file/polish the front of the LED flat, be careful not to file down to the internal parts. This at least gives you a more point source.

A better alternative is to either focus the LED down to a pinhole or launch it into a fibre and then use the output of the fibre as the source.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top