MHB Collin's question via email about solving a DE using Laplace Transforms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation y'' + 4y = H(t - 7) with initial conditions y(0) = 0 and y'(0) = -10 using Laplace Transforms. The Laplace Transform is applied to both sides, leading to an expression for Y(s) that incorporates the Heaviside function and initial conditions. Partial fraction decomposition is used to simplify the inverse transform process, allowing the solution to be expressed in terms of sine functions and Heaviside functions. The final solution is y(t) = H(t - 7) - (1/8)sin[2(t - 7)]H(t - 7) - 5sin(2t), which is verified to satisfy the original differential equation. The method is noted for its efficiency and reduced potential for error compared to alternative approaches.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Solve the following Differential Equation:

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y'' + 4\,y = \mathrm{H}\,\left( t - 7 \right) \textrm{ with } y\left( 0 \right) = 0 \textrm{ and } y'\left( 0 \right) = -10 \end{align*}$

Taking the Laplace Transform of both sides we have

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{L}\,\left\{ y'' + 4\,y \right\} &= \mathcal{L}\,\left\{ \mathrm{H}\,\left( t - 7 \right) \right\} \\ s^2\,Y\left( s \right) - s\,y\left( 0 \right) - y'\left( 0 \right) + 4\,Y\left( s \right) &= \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-7\,s}}{s} \\ s^2\,Y\left( s \right) + 10 + 4\,Y\left( s \right) &= \frac{ \mathrm{e}^{-7\,s}}{s} \\ \left( s^2 + 4 \right) \, Y\left( s \right) &= \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-7\,s}}{s} - 10 \\ Y\left( s \right) &= \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-7\,s}}{s\,\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } - \frac{10}{s^2 + 4} \end{align*}$

So to solve the DE, all that we require now is to take the Inverse Laplace Transform of this result. To do this with the first term, we will need to use Partial Fractions:

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{A}{s} + \frac{B\,s + C}{s^2 + 4} &\equiv \frac{1}{s\,\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } \\ A\,\left( s^2 + 4 \right) + \left( B\,s + C \right) \, s &= 1 \end{align*}$

Let $\displaystyle \begin{align*} s = 0 \end{align*}$ to find $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 4\,A = 1 \implies A = \frac{1}{4} \end{align*}$.

The coefficient of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} s^2 \end{align*}$ is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A + B \end{align*}$ on the left and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 0 \end{align*}$ on the right, and as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A = \frac{1}{4} \end{align*}$ we have $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{1}{4} + B = 0 \implies B = -\frac{1}{4} \end{align*}$.

The coefficient of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} s \end{align*}$ is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} C \end{align*}$ on the left and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 0 \end{align*}$ on the right, thus $\displaystyle \begin{align*} C = 0 \end{align*}$.

Therefore $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{1}{s\,\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } = \frac{1}{4\,s} - \frac{s}{4\,\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } \end{align*}$. So that means

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y &= \mathcal{L}^{-1}\,\left\{ \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-7\,s}}{s\,\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } - \frac{10}{s^2 + 4} \right\} \\ &= \frac{1}{4} \mathcal{L}^{-1}\,\left\{ \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-7\,s}}{s} \right\} - \frac{1}{8} \,\mathcal{L}^{-1}\,\left\{ \mathrm{e}^{-7\,s} \,\left( \frac{2}{ s^2 + 2^2 } \right) \right\} - 5\,\mathcal{L}^{-1}\,\left\{ \frac{2}{s^2 + 2^2} \right\} \end{align*}$

The first and third terms are very straightforward. For the second term, we need to make use of the rule $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{L}\,\left\{ f\left( t - c \right) \, \mathrm{H}\,\left( t - c \right) \right\} = \mathrm{e}^{-c\,s}\,F\left( s \right) \end{align*}$. We can read off that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} F\left( s \right) = \frac{2}{ s^2 + 2^2} \end{align*}$ and thus $\displaystyle \begin{align*} f\left( t \right) = \sin{ \left( 2\,t \right) } \end{align*}$. From here we can get that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} f\left( t - 7 \right) = \sin{ \left[ 2\,\left( t - 7 \right) \right] } \end{align*}$, and finally the solution to the DE is

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = \mathrm{H}\,\left( t - 7 \right) - \frac{1}{8}\sin{ \left[ 2\,\left( t - 7 \right) \right] }\,\mathrm{H}\,\left( t - 7 \right) - 5 \sin{ \left( 2\,t \right) } \end{align*}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Careful students will check the solution to ensure that it actually is a solution to the DE.
 
By using the inversion formula and residue calculus I get \begin{split}<br /> y(t) &amp;= 10 \left( \frac{e^{2it}}{4i} + \frac{e^{-2it}}{-4i}\right) + \left( \frac14 + \frac{e^{2i(t-7)}}{(2i)(4i)}<br /> + \frac{e^{-2i(t-7)}}{(-2i)(-4i)} \right)H(t-7) \\<br /> &amp;= 5\sin(2t) + \left(\tfrac14 - \tfrac14\cos(2(t-7))\right)H(t-7).\end{split} I feel this involved less work, with less scope for error, than manipulating \dfrac{10}{s^2 + 4} + \dfrac{e^{-7s}}{s(s^2+4)} into a form where its inverse transform can be read from tables.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top