Colonies on Mars -- fundamental problem

[Timber]

The fact that Mars is red comes close to proving in itself that at one time it was home to a very large biome. The methane plumes may lead us to absolute proof. Then there's the Viking data, which appeared to find evidence of current-day extremophile bacteria.

https://phys.org/news/2016-10-year-old-viking-life-mars.html

 

[p1l0t]

I say we get there BEFORE the beauracracy catches up.

 

[sophiecentaur]

I don't get it. If people are confident they can survive on Mars, and are willing to take the risk in exchange for being the first inhabitants on a new planet, who are you on this forum to tell them they can't or shouldn't? Nobody is forcing them or you to go. If it scares you, stay home.

That's one way of looking at it but there are people in all walks of life who can be persuaded into actions that put them in danger. Drug dealers use the fact that people can be lured into very dangerous behaviour and so can religious extremists and casinos. Make anything attractive enough and there will always be someone daft enough to take it up.
Who am I to make that comment? A thinking person who has concern for others. My opinion is what it's worth and no more but at least my point is a humane one.

 

[sophiecentaur]

I say we get there BEFORE the beauracracy catches up.

. . . . which was the attitude to destroying the rainforest and for fishing out the North Atlantic Cod etc. etc.. Then leave it to the grandchildren to sort out the result.

 

[DrStupid]

Did you not get the Irony?

Does that mean there actually are no "Mars advocates" claiming something like that? Than what was the point of this post?

 

[p1l0t]

. . . . which was the attitude to destroying the rainforest and for fishing out the North Atlantic Cod etc. etc.. Then leave it to the grandchildren to sort out the result.

Well but Mars is already not suitable for humans. If anything we should send 2/3 of the population there and then maybe Earth will have a chance of being preserved.

 

[sophiecentaur]

Does that mean there actually are no "Mars advocates" claiming something like that? Than what was the point of this post?

I think the point was that all the 'simple' solutions for living on Mars seem to be dismissed as too hard when applied to surviving on a 'broken' Earth. I have to agree with that too. Temperature and gravity are two factors that make living on Earth (even in fall out shelters etc. ) far preferable to any other alternative yet Mars fans still favour the Mars solution.

 

[sophiecentaur]

Well but Mars is already not suitable for humans. If anything we should send 2/3 of the population there and then maybe Earth will have a chance of being preserved.

Or perhaps just have a good war. Alternatively just wait for a massive plague. Horrific circumstances but the outcome could be limited overall damage. People always assume that we can actually do something about it' and it may not always be the case.
PS Cost of a few billion one way tickets?

 

[p1l0t]

Or perhaps just have a good war. Alternatively just wait for a massive plague. Horrific circumstances but the outcome could be limited overall damage. People always assume that we can actually do something about it' and it may not always be the case.
PS Cost of a few billion one way tickets?

Be careful what you wish for... No sane person would make such a decision unless it was the only hope left for humanity. Which is probably why we will wait until it's far too late.

 

[sophiecentaur]

Not what I wish. It would be no surprise, though.

 

[rootone]

If you were a stranded humanoid space alien or just some AI; your warp drives had packed up, but you still had some fuel to do short distance maneuvers.
I'd say Earth would look like be a better place to attempt a landing than Mars.

 

[PeterDonis]

Thread closed for moderation. This topic has been discussed many times already on PF; there might not be much point in another discussion.

 

[berkeman]

Thread will remain closed. Thank you to all who participated.