Comments on my physics PhD applicant profile

  • Admissions
  • Thread starter thematrix1101
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physics
In summary, the document provides feedback on a physics PhD applicant's profile, highlighting strengths such as strong academic performance and relevant research experience, while also pointing out areas for improvement, including the need for more publications and stronger recommendation letters. It emphasizes the importance of a well-rounded application that showcases both technical skills and personal qualities.
  • #1
thematrix1101
5
0
Hello! As I nervously wait to hear back from my physics PhD applications, I thought it would be helpful to see what you guys think of my profile and the schools I applied to.

Note: I am a senior undergrad and will be graduating this upcoming summer. Domestic applicant.

Research Field: Quantum information/hardware, experimental condensed matter

Undergrad Institution: Large R1 state school (top 30 in physics)

GPA: 3.53 overall (after Fall semester, 3.47 when I sent the applications), 3.38/3.3 in major
My GPA is mainly brought down from intro physics and math courses in first two years. I had all As and two B+ in junior-senior year and upper level physics courses.

Research:
  1. Research assistant in a superconducting quantum systems laboratory for more than 2 years now. I did a lot of microwave engineering projects to develop our lab's pulse control system for qubit experience. I was selected for prestigious Honors thesis program of my department and currently working on my thesis project (experimentally probing superconducting properties of materials using superconducting circuits).
  2. NSF REU at a small private university in condensed matter physics (summer of junior year). My project involved nanofabrication of devices for experimentally studying the Quantum Hall Effect in graphene. I gained a ton of extremely crucial experimental skills for my field, as well as presented a poster on my research at the end of summer symposium of the host institution and the APS Mid-Atlantic conference.
  3. Worked for a semester on a computational physics project towards the beginning of my undergrad, but nothing substantial or noteworthy except some programming and data analysis.
Other experiences:
  1. Laboratory assistant at my institution's physics lecture hall for 2.5 years now (10 hours/week). Built, set up, and fixed physics demonstrations for university lectures, as well as doing several physics shows for the public.
  2. Network Administrator for the Society of Physics Students (SPS). Developed a student-run network cluster for the physics department.
  3. Learning Assistant for a physics laboratory course and peer mentor for SPS.
Recommendations: Expecting pretty strong (or at least good) recommendation letters. Two letters from my research advisors (research #1 and #2), one from professor of 400-level quantum computing course, one from supervisor of lab assistant job (other experiences #1). All letter writers have degrees from reputable institutions (two with PhDs from Ivy Leagues and pretty well-known in their fields).

PhD programs applied to (all in my current field):
  • University of Delaware (met with faculty member of interest during conference, toured his lab)
  • Rutgers University (strong interest from faculty member)
  • Stony Brook University
  • Penn State University
  • New York University (met with faculty member who is close with my one of my research advisors and had substantial discussions)
  • University of Maryland
  • University of Pennsylvania (utilized and received certifications from their nanofabrication facility during REU)
  • Cornell University (research advisor is PhD alumni)
  • Yale University
Additional information:
  • South Asian male
  • Moved to the US in high school
  • First generation college student, low-income household

Any comments and feedback will be much appreciated! Particularly interested to know how competitive my profile is and if the range of schools are appropriate given my credentials.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
They look like reasonable matches. The "hooks" for undergraduate admissions you describe will make little to no difference for admissions. Citizenship status may, as many universities treat internationals differently.
 
  • Like
Likes thematrix1101
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
They look like reasonable matches. The "hooks" for undergraduate admissions you describe will make little to no difference for admissions. Citizenship status may, as many universities treat internationals differently.
even the connections/meetings with faculty of interest?

I am a US citizen, so hopefully that helps.
 
  • #4
thematrix1101 said:
even the connections/meetings with faculty of interest?
I don't understand the question. Are suggesting that you are less likely to get admitted because of this? Huh? Or do you mean that your research is so stupendous that you will automatically get in. No, that won't happen.
 
  • #5
OP: In a previous thread, you asked for feedback prior to submitting your applications. That had value since there was opportunity to rectify some deficiencies. But at this point, what's done is done: there is no further opportunity to rectify any residual deficiencies. Nothing that anyone posts here will change the outcomes. So you might as well concentrate on getting the most out of the rest of your senior year.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, gwnorth and berkeman

FAQ: Comments on my physics PhD applicant profile

What are the key components that make a strong physics PhD application?

A strong physics PhD application typically includes a high GPA, strong letters of recommendation, relevant research experience, a well-written statement of purpose, and competitive GRE scores (if required). Demonstrating a clear understanding of your research interests and how they align with the program's strengths is also crucial.

How important are research experiences and publications in my application?

Research experiences and publications are very important in a physics PhD application. They demonstrate your ability to conduct independent research, your familiarity with scientific methodologies, and your contribution to the field. Publications, while not mandatory, can significantly strengthen your application by showcasing your research skills and findings.

What should I include in my statement of purpose?

Your statement of purpose should include your academic background, research experiences, specific research interests, and career goals. It should also explain why you are interested in the particular program and how your interests align with the faculty's expertise. Highlighting any unique experiences or skills that make you a strong candidate is also beneficial.

How can I improve my letters of recommendation?

To improve your letters of recommendation, choose recommenders who know you well and can speak to your academic abilities, research potential, and personal qualities. Provide them with your CV, statement of purpose, and any other relevant information to help them write a detailed and supportive letter. It's also helpful to remind them of specific projects or accomplishments you worked on together.

What GPA and GRE scores are considered competitive for physics PhD programs?

Competitive GPA and GRE scores can vary by program, but generally, a GPA of 3.5 or higher is considered strong. For the GRE, scores in the 80th percentile or higher for the quantitative section are often expected. However, some programs may place more emphasis on other aspects of your application, such as research experience and letters of recommendation.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
714
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
911
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
953
Back
Top