- #1
VKint
- 139
- 12
This question came up in this thread: <https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ydrogen-atom-hamiltonian.933842/#post-5898454>
In the course of answering the OP's question, I came across the commutator
$$ \left[ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r} \right] $$
where ##r = (x_1 + x_2 + x_3)^{1/2}## and ##p_k## is the momentum operator conjugate to ##x_k##. It's easy to show that the commutator is
$$ -i \hbar \left( \frac{1}{r} - \frac{x_k^2}{r^3} \right) $$
by working in the position basis. My question is: Is there a more elegant way (i.e., independent of basis) of deriving this commutator?
In the course of answering the OP's question, I came across the commutator
$$ \left[ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r} \right] $$
where ##r = (x_1 + x_2 + x_3)^{1/2}## and ##p_k## is the momentum operator conjugate to ##x_k##. It's easy to show that the commutator is
$$ -i \hbar \left( \frac{1}{r} - \frac{x_k^2}{r^3} \right) $$
by working in the position basis. My question is: Is there a more elegant way (i.e., independent of basis) of deriving this commutator?