- #1
abdo375
- 133
- 0
What is the pro's and con's of each ?
And where did 250 come from?
That made me chuckle. The "~" sign on the input voltage for appliances would mean AC, not approximately. The ~ sign is used for both, but in the context of the power mains, it stands for AC. It is definitely true that there are tolerances on the various AC mains standards, and when discussing a particular power grid, the nominal voltage is usually what is listed. There are some pretty unusual standards around the world.abdo375 said:There is a variation of the 250v and 110v, there is 120,130 and 140 and there is 220,230,240 and 250 volts hence most electric appliances have the ~ sign across the input voltage.
Good question. I don't think they have a traditional neutral conductor in the EU (I could be wrong), but for the US, the NEC (National Electric Code) specifies that each neutral wire be connected to Earth ground at the circuit breaker panel. So at the breaker box, the AC voltage on all the neutral wires is zero with respect to Earth ground (and the hots are all at about 110Vrms with respect to the neutrals and Earth ground). The respective hot/neutral pairs head out from the breaker panel through the home or office and connect up to their respective distributed parallel loads (lights, machines, etc.). The AC current that powers the circuit is flowing in both the hot and neutral wires, so the voltage on the neutral wire with respect to Earth ground out at the end of the power cable is determined by the current flowing and the resistance of the neutral wire length back to the breaker box. If you have several amps of current through several ohms of wire, you will get several volts rms on neutral at the end of a long run of cable.david90 said:can you get shock by touching only the neutral wire? I heard sometime the Voltage between neutral and ground is 30v
That made me chuckle. The "~" sign on the input voltage for appliances would mean AC, not approximately. The ~ sign is used for both, but in the context of the power mains, it stands for AC. It is definitely true that there are tolerances on the various AC mains standards, and when discussing a particular power grid, the nominal voltage is usually what is listed. There are some pretty unusual standards around the world.
With respect to the EU 230Vrms at 50Hz versus the US standard of 110Vrms at 60Hz, the higher voltage in the EU gives more power available with less loss in the wiring, but requires higher voltage rated components in the power supplies and in the devices that attach to the power mains. In typical US home wiring, there are two 110Vrms wires (Hot1 and Hot2) and one Neutral wire, and the two 110Vrms lines are 180 degrees out of phase. So you can wire 220Vrms to your clothes drier or other high-power devices, and wire either 110Vrms circuit to other devices. This flexibility provides a lot of the EU voltage advantage, while allowing most devices to use the easier 110Vrms requirements for safety spacings and component specs.
I've heard that 50Hz versus 60Hz does make a difference in how the human body reacts to accidental shocks (one makes it harder to let go or something), but I don't know the details of that.
abdo375 said:Thanks for the replay but why does the US use 110 v in the first place?
Active investing involves actively buying and selling investments in an attempt to outperform the market. This approach requires a lot of research and analysis to identify undervalued securities. Passive investing, on the other hand, involves buying and holding a diverse portfolio of investments that track a market index. This approach has lower fees and typically yields returns that closely mirror the market.
There is no definitive answer to this question as it ultimately depends on an individual's risk tolerance and investment goals. Active investing can potentially yield higher returns but also carries a higher risk. Passive investing, while typically yielding lower returns, is a more stable and less hands-on approach that can be suitable for long-term investing.
Yes, it is possible to use a combination of active and passive investing in a portfolio. This is known as a hybrid approach and can provide the benefits of both strategies. For example, an investor could have a core portfolio of passive index funds and actively manage a smaller portion of their portfolio for higher potential returns.
Some key factors to consider when comparing different investment approaches include risk tolerance, investment goals, time horizon, fees and expenses, diversification, and the amount of research and analysis required. It's important to carefully evaluate these factors and choose an approach that aligns with your individual financial situation and objectives.
While passive investing has lower fees and is a more hands-off approach, it does have some potential drawbacks. One major drawback is the lack of control over the specific investments in a passive portfolio. Additionally, passive investing may not perform as well in a volatile market or during times of economic downturn. It's important to carefully consider these potential drawbacks when deciding on an investment approach.