Comparing $gH$ and $Hg$ for Infinite & Finite Groups

In summary, if $G$ is a finite group and $H$ is a finite subgroup of $G$, then $gHg^{-1}\subseteq H$.
  • #1
alexmahone
304
0
Suppose $G$ is an infinite group and $H$ is an infinite subgroup of $G$.

Let $g\in G$.

Suppose $\forall h\in H\ \exists h'\in H$ such that $gh=h'g$.

Can we conclude that $gH=Hg$?

What if $G$ and $H$ are of finite orders?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Alexmahone said:
Suppose $G$ is an infinite group and $H$ is an infinite subgroup of $G$.

Let $g\in G$.

Suppose $\forall h\in H\ \exists h'\in H$ such that $gh=h'g$.

Can we conclude that $gH=Hg$?

What if $G$ and $H$ are of finite orders?
I don't have an answer, just an observation. It is possible that given g and h that the h' might generate a subset of H, not all of H. (ie. \(\displaystyle \exists f: H \to H'\) is not an bijection.) In which case \(\displaystyle gH = H'g \subseteq Hg\) in general. I don't know if that helps or not.

-Dan
 
  • #3
Alexmahone said:
Suppose $G$ is an infinite group and $H$ is an infinite subgroup of $G$.

Let $g\in G$.

Suppose $\forall h\in H\ \exists h'\in H$ such that $gh=h'g$.

Can we conclude that $gH=Hg$?

What if $G$ and $H$ are of finite orders?

Hi Alexmahone,

I believe your statement is correct, but only for finite groups. Suppose $G$ is finite. The given condition implies $gH \subset Hg$. Since there is a bijection $gH \leftrightarrow Hg$, then $gH$ and $Hg$ have the same number of elements. Hence, $gH = Hg$.
 
  • #4
Actually, the statement also holds when $G$ is commutative, infinite or not. The condition would not be needed in such a case.
 
  • #5
Your problem rephrased slightly:
If $G$ is a group, $H$ a subgroup of $G$ and $g\in G$ with $gHg^{-1}\subseteq H$, does $gHg^{-1}=H$?

Euge has answered in the affirmative for some cases; also this follows if $g$ has finite order, easy proof.

I think an example is needed that shows this is not always true. To follow the example, you need to know a little about group presentations.

Let $G=<a\,,b\,:\, b^{-1}ab=a^2>,\,H=<a>\text{ and } g=b^{-1}$
Since conjugation is a homomorphism, $gHg^{-1}\subseteq H$. If this conjugation were an onto map, there would exist an integer $k$ with $ga^kg^{-1}=a$. But $ga^kg^{-1}=a^{2k}$ . Since $a$ has infinite order (loosely speaking there is no relation that allows $a$ to have finite order), we would get that $2k=1$, impossible. So $gHg^{-1}\neq H$.
 

FAQ: Comparing $gH$ and $Hg$ for Infinite & Finite Groups

What is the difference between $gH$ and $Hg$ for infinite and finite groups?

For infinite groups, $gH$ refers to the set of all elements obtained by multiplying each element of the subgroup $H$ by a single element $g$ from the group. On the other hand, $Hg$ refers to the set of all elements obtained by multiplying a single element $g$ from the group with each element of the subgroup $H$. For finite groups, the two notations are equivalent.

How do $gH$ and $Hg$ affect the order of elements in infinite and finite groups?

In infinite groups, $gH$ and $Hg$ do not affect the order of elements, as they simply represent different ways of listing the same elements. However, in finite groups, the order of elements in $gH$ and $Hg$ may differ, as the order of multiplication matters in finite groups.

What are some real-life applications of comparing $gH$ and $Hg$ for infinite and finite groups?

One application is in cryptography, where these notations are used in the Diffie-Hellman key exchange algorithm. Here, the notations are used to represent the multiplication of a generator element with different powers, which is used to generate a shared secret key between two parties.

Can $gH$ and $Hg$ be used interchangeably in all cases?

Infinite groups are abelian, meaning that the order of multiplication does not matter. Therefore, $gH$ and $Hg$ can be used interchangeably in infinite groups. However, in finite groups, the order of multiplication matters, so the two notations may not be equivalent in all cases.

How do $gH$ and $Hg$ relate to subgroups and cosets?

Infinite groups, $gH$ and $Hg$ are equivalent to the subgroup $H$ and its cosets. In finite groups, $gH$ and $Hg$ represent different cosets of the subgroup $H$. This relationship is useful in studying the properties of subgroups and cosets in group theory.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top