Comparing Topologies: Rl and Rk vs. Standard Topology

  • Thread starter tomboi03
  • Start date
In summary, the Rl (lower limit topology) and Rk (set of all numbers of the form 1/n) are both topologies that can be compared to the standard topology. However, not all topologies are comparable and to prove that one is more comparable than the other, all open sets in one must be open in the other. If two topologies are not comparable, there must be an open set in one that is not open in the other, and vice versa.
  • #1
tomboi03
77
0
The question is
Show that the topologies of Rl (which is the lower limit topology) and then... RK (which is the set of all numbers of the form 1/n, for n E [tex]Z[/tex]+ meaning that they are all 1/n for all the positive integers)

So i can compare this to the standard topology which is...
Given a basis element (a,b) for the standard topology (i will call this T) and a point x of (a,b), the basis element [x,b)for Rl contains x and lies in (a,b). ON the other hand, given the basis element [x,b) for Rl there is no open interval (a,b) that contians x and lies in [x,d). Thus Rl is strictly finer than T.

same applies to Rk.
Given a basis element (a,b) for the standard topology (i will call this T) and a point x of (a,b), the basis element for Rk contains x. ON the other hand, given the basis element B=(-1,2) - K for Rk and the point 0 of B, There is no open interval that contains 0 and lies in B.

I don't know how i can compare the two together... i might be like blind... and that i might be right under my nose... but still.. I'm struggling.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Not all topologies are comparable. If you want to prove that one is more comparable than the other, you prove that all open sets in one are open sets in the other. To prove that two topologies aren't comparable, find an open set in one that isn't open in the other, then find one that is open in the other that isn't open in the first one.
 

FAQ: Comparing Topologies: Rl and Rk vs. Standard Topology

What is the purpose of comparing topologies?

Comparing topologies is essential for understanding the structure and organization of complex systems, such as biological networks or computer networks. It allows us to identify similarities and differences between different systems and gain insights into their functionality and behavior.

What are the different types of topologies that can be compared?

There are various types of topologies that can be compared, including physical topologies (such as bus, star, or ring), logical topologies (such as token ring or Ethernet), and network topologies (such as point-to-point, mesh, or tree). Each type has its own unique characteristics and can be analyzed and compared in different ways.

How is the comparison of topologies beneficial in real-world applications?

The comparison of topologies has many practical applications, such as in network design and optimization, system troubleshooting, and identifying vulnerabilities in networks. It can also be used in fields such as biology, sociology, and economics to understand the structure and dynamics of complex systems.

What are some methods used for comparing topologies?

There are several methods that can be used to compare topologies, including visual analysis, mathematical modeling, and computer simulations. Each method has its own advantages and limitations, and the choice of method will depend on the specific goals and context of the comparison.

Can topologies be compared across different systems or networks?

Yes, topologies can be compared across different systems or networks, as long as they have similar characteristics and can be represented in a comparable way. For example, the topology of a social network can be compared to the topology of a computer network, as both can be represented as graphs with nodes and edges.

Similar threads

I Is H a Lie Group with Subspace Topology from T^2?
Replies
17
Views
3K
Standard topology is coarser than lower limit topology?
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
I Is [0,1] under the subspace topology Hausdorff, Compact, or Connected?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I The Order Topology .... .... Singh, Example 1.4.4 .... ....
Replies
2
Views
2K
Clarifying Topology Basics: What is U?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Is the Collection of Rational Balls a Basis for the Euclidean Topology on R^n?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Local Basis in Topology .... Definitions by Croom and Singh .... ....
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Topology Words: Reasons for the particular names
Replies
2
Views
2K
I On two definitions of locally compact
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Induced orientation on boundary of ##\mathbb{H}^n## in ##\mathbb{R}^n##
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top