Compatibility of MWI with probability of outcomes

In summary: Unitary evolution of the wavefunction is assumed to always hold. Not being able to reconstruct the Born rule is simply an open issue with that interpretation.
  • #36
entropy1 said:
COULD you say that the outcome is not determined until observed, and NOT EVEN determined AFTER that because we have the superposition of ALL outcomes?

No. MWI is always deterministic.

The correct way to say it is the way I have already said it.

entropy1 said:
To be speculative

Personal speculations are out of bounds.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
The OP question has been answered and the thread is becoming speculative. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

A MWI and the entangled photon experiment
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
I What does "multiple worlds" in MWI mean?
Replies
20
Views
1K
I How Does the Many-Worlds Interpretation Address Nonlocality?
Replies
10
Views
364
I Why do we experience the Born Rule in Many Worlds?
Replies
34
Views
3K
I Why is this interpretation of MWI wrong?
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Binomial distribution of "worlds" in MWI
Replies
7
Views
1K
I MWI and interpretation of measurements
Replies
15
Views
3K
I What is the true nature of worlds in the Many-Worlds Interpretation?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Does MWI Agree on Measurement Apparatus Pointer?
Replies
18
Views
2K
I MWI and macroscopic probability
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top