- #1
joypav
- 151
- 0
Suppose the polynomial p has all its zeros in the closed half-plane $Re w\le0$, and any zeros that lie on the imaginary axis are of order one.
$$p(z)=det(zI-A),$$
where I is the n x n identity matrix.
Show that any solution of the system
$$\dot{x}=Ax+b$$
remains bounded as $t\to{\infty}$.
Work out in detail the solution of the system with
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & w \\
-w & 0 \\
\end{bmatrix}, w>0
$$
to verify what happens in one special case.
So we have...
$$p(z)=det(zI-A)$$
$$p(z)=det( \begin{bmatrix}
z & 0 \\
0 & z \\
\end{bmatrix}-
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & w \\
-w & 0 \\
\end{bmatrix})=
det(\begin{bmatrix}
z & -w \\
w & z \\
\end{bmatrix})=z^2+w^2=(z+wi)(z-wi)
$$
Both zeros are on the imaginary axis and are both of order one.
Now I am supposed to find the solution of the system?
Do we use that the solution of the system is of the form
$$x_l(t)=\sum_{j=1}^2p_{jl}(t)e^{\lambda_jt}, l=1,2?$$
So
$$\lambda_1=wi,\lambda_2=-wi$$
I have no idea if I'm going in the right direction or not.
I would really like some help with the specific problem, not necessarily the more generalized proof. I think if I knew how to solve the specific problem given then I'd have a much better understanding.
$$p(z)=det(zI-A),$$
where I is the n x n identity matrix.
Show that any solution of the system
$$\dot{x}=Ax+b$$
remains bounded as $t\to{\infty}$.
Work out in detail the solution of the system with
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & w \\
-w & 0 \\
\end{bmatrix}, w>0
$$
to verify what happens in one special case.
So we have...
$$p(z)=det(zI-A)$$
$$p(z)=det( \begin{bmatrix}
z & 0 \\
0 & z \\
\end{bmatrix}-
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & w \\
-w & 0 \\
\end{bmatrix})=
det(\begin{bmatrix}
z & -w \\
w & z \\
\end{bmatrix})=z^2+w^2=(z+wi)(z-wi)
$$
Both zeros are on the imaginary axis and are both of order one.
Now I am supposed to find the solution of the system?
Do we use that the solution of the system is of the form
$$x_l(t)=\sum_{j=1}^2p_{jl}(t)e^{\lambda_jt}, l=1,2?$$
So
$$\lambda_1=wi,\lambda_2=-wi$$
I have no idea if I'm going in the right direction or not.
I would really like some help with the specific problem, not necessarily the more generalized proof. I think if I knew how to solve the specific problem given then I'd have a much better understanding.