Compton Scattering - Find x component of electron momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final momentum of a photon in Compton scattering without knowing the final wavelength. The initial momentum is established, but the lack of final wavelength or electron kinetic energy complicates the calculation. Participants suggest using the change in wavelength formula from a previous thread to determine the final wavelength. Emphasis is placed on the importance of including correct units when stating values to avoid losing marks in academic settings. The conversation highlights the challenges of solving physics problems with incomplete information.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
p=h/wavelength
So I can find the initial momentum using p=h/wave = 4.98 x 10-23. Now my problem is that I don't know the final momentum of the photon nor electron, I just know the photon is scattered at an angle of 34 degrees.

I know how to solve this problem if I was given the final wavelength of the light, but that's not given.

p initial = cos(34)* mag. of photon momentum + x component of electron momentum

From the above equation all I need is the final magnitude of the momentum of the photon. Since the final wavelength is not given idk how to find this. If the velocity or kinetic energy of the electron was given I could use energy conservation to find the answer, but that's not given either.

I just don't understand how to calculate the final momentum of the photon if no final wavelength is given.
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    7.9 KB · Views: 173
Physics news on Phys.org
;
JoeyBob said:
I just don't understand how to calculate the final momentum of the photon if no final wavelength is given.
Have you solved this yet? If not, see the formula you stated in post #7 in your other thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/compton-scattering-determine-momentum.1001734/

Also, you can easily avoid losing marks in exams/assignments by including the correct units with values. For example to state a momentum is '4.98 x 10-23' is incomplete: is that in units of g.cm/s, or lbs.ft/s, or something else?
 
Steve4Physics said:
;
Have you solved this yet? If not, see the formula you stated in post #7 in your other thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/compton-scattering-determine-momentum.1001734/

Also, you can easily avoid losing marks in exams/assignments by including the correct units with values. For example to state a momentum is '4.98 x 10-23' is incomplete: is that in units of g.cm/s, or lbs.ft/s, or something else?

I mean I thought I understood it since I was able to use momentum or energy to solve the problem you cite in that thread. The issue here is I don't have the final wavelength so nothing seems to work.

Units are what I use as a last resort and don't always help. Trying to cancel them out units to give the units of the answer ect.
 
JoeyBob said:
I mean I thought I understood it since I was able to use momentum or energy to solve the problem you cite in that thread. The issue here is I don't have the final wavelength so nothing seems to work.

Units are what I use as a last resort and don't always help. Trying to cancel them out units to give the units of the answer ect.
In post #7 of https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/compton-scattering-determine-momentum.1001734/ you wrote “change in wavelength = (h/mc)(1-cos(angle)”.

You got the brackets wrong, but you can sort this out.

Use your formula to find the change in wavelength. Then add this to the initial wavelength. This gives you the final wavelength.

Units are not ‘a last resort’. It is incorrect to state a value without correct units. Like saying “This piece of string is 15 long”. Also, it creates a very poor impression when someone sees it - and it will cost you marks in examinations. Your decision!

Edit. I don't mean puitting units into equations. I mean including the units when stating single values.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top