Computing Line Integrals Related to Vector Field F in R2

In summary, Peter said that the potential of F on Ω is undefined. He then said that he's stuck on finding a closed form formula for the potential of F, but he'll get it.
  • #1
cereeal
7
0
We are given a vector field:
F=[tex]\frac{-y}{x^2+y^2}[/tex] , [tex]\frac{x}{x^2+y^2}[/tex]
Then asked if F is conservative on R2 \ (0,0). I just solved the partial derivatives of each part of the vector field and they did indeed equal each other, but I don't under stand what the "\(0,0)" part means.

We are then asked to compute the line integral where C is an arbitrary closed smooth contour that encloses the origin. I used Green's Theorom to solve this and got 2pi.
We are then asked to compute the line integral where C is an arbitrary closed smooth contour that does not enclose the origin. I have no idea where to start on this one.

We are then given the function arctan(y/x) and asked if it is a potential of F. I did this easy enough, but then we are asked if that function is a potential of F on each quadrant (not including the coordinate axes). I didn't quite understand how it wouldn't be, perhaps because the function doesn't exist when x=0?

Lastly, and sorry about all the questions, let C be a smooth curve in R2 that does not passes through the origin. Find all possible values of the line integral.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
F is undefined at (0,0). R/(0,0) is the plane without the origin. And you can't use Greens theorem directly for a curve that encloses the origin. What did you do? You CAN use it if the curve doesn't enclose the origin. What are you double integrating in that case? And yes, the problem with the potential arctan(y/x) is that it isn't defined at x=0. So you can only use it as a potential for regions that don't cross the y axis. Finally for the last part, what do you get for the line integral if C is a curve that goes around the origin twice counterclockwise? What about clockwise?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
For the Green's Theorem I made an arbitrary counterclockwise circle (C') within the enclosed region (D). This gave me:
[tex]\int _{C} P dx + Q dy + \int_{-C'} P dx + Q dy = \int \int_{D} (\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}) dA = 0[/tex]

Therefor the two integrals on the left side of the equation are equal. You can then fill in the parametrization values and end up with 2pi.
 
  • #4
cereeal said:
For the Green's Theorem I made an arbitrary counterclockwise circle (C') within the enclosed region (D). This gave me:
[tex]\int _{C} P dx + Q dy + \int_{-C'} P dx + Q dy = \int \int_{D} (\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}) dA = 0[/tex]

Therefor the two integrals on the right side of the equation are equal. You can then fill in the parametrization values and end up 2pi.

That's fine. If C doesn't enclose the origin, then it's even easier. You don't need the inner circle.
 
  • #5
Thanks, couldn't get those integrals working for some reason.
And that's true, I don't know why I didn't think of using the same application on the closed shape not at the origin, I was stuck on using the inner circle.

So for my last question would I still just be applying Green's theorem to it?
 
  • #6
cereeal said:
Thanks, couldn't get those integrals working for some reason.
And that's true, I don't know why I didn't think of using the same application on the closed shape not at the origin, I was stuck on using the inner circle.

So for my last question would I still just be applying Green's theorem to it?

Sure, if it doesn't enclose the origin just use Green's theorem directly. For curves that wrap, say twice counterclockwise around the origin, just work on the special case of a circle and do the path integral directly. To wrap twice around the origin just change your parameter limits to 0 to 4pi instead of 0 to 2pi.
 
  • #7
Just one question: When C doesn't enclose the origin, are you supposed to find a constant value like the 2pi you get when C was enclosing the origin?
 
  • #8
modtor said:
Just one question: When C doesn't enclose the origin, are you supposed to find a constant value like the 2pi you get when C was enclosing the origin?

Yes. You get a constant. What is it??
 
  • #9
It is alright the answer was simple... my mistake
 
  • #10
Explanation: Suppose that (x0,y0) and (x1,y1) are 2 points in C. We connect the 2 points by 2 different paths C1 and C2
Let C=C2-C1
Then the very left side of your integral is equal to 0
[tex]
\int _{C} P dx + Q dy = 0
[/tex]
 
  • #11
Another question:
Let Ω= R^2\{(0,y);y≥0}. Find a closed form formula for the potential of F on Ω
I don't know how to start the calculation
 
  • #12
yaaaa peter SHI!
 
  • #13
MTH 254... Oh Yeah
For the formula for the potential of F, I am stuck. I get something like:
[tex] f_{x} = \frac{-y}{x^2 + y^2}[\tex]
[tex] f_{y} = \frac{x}{x^2 + y^2}[\tex]
We have to take care of the restrictions {(0,y);y≥0}
Do you have an idea how to go farther?
 
  • #14
modtor said:
MTH 254... Oh Yeah
For the formula for the potential of F, I am stuck. I get something like:
[tex] f_{x} = \frac{-y}{x^2 + y^2}[\tex]
[tex] f_{y} = \frac{x}{x^2 + y^2}[\tex]
We have to take care of the restrictions {(0,y);y≥0}
Do you have an idea how to go farther?

So you characters are all in the same class? Then put your heads together. If you've figured out arctan(y/x) is a potential function, then you should realize that's an angle. Think about it for a bit.
 
  • #15
modtor, for g) when you integrate it without any parameters you get just t as the indefinite answer,, does that mean all possible values are between 0 and 2pi or if not, than what?
 
  • #16
Ok for g), there is 2 possibilities: as long as the smooth curve does not pass through the origin, either C encloses the origin or C doesn't enclose the origin. So you have to use your answer from question c) and d) to answer to this one...
Does it look good?
 
  • #17
What parametrization did you use for C? I tried thinking about what Dick said a few posts ago and it seems the line integral increases the more turns you go around a path so wouldn't that mean all values are possible?

And for the last question, because arctan(y/x) isn't defined on the y-axis and we know it is a potential of F, wouldn't that be the formula for the potential. I'm not sure I exactly am getting your hint Dick, but again thank you for the help.
 
  • #18
For which question do you want to know my parametrization?
 
  • #19
ok yea, for c its 2pi, and d its zero, so g) i put 0=<t=<2pi.



or wait, your saying, that since it doesn't pass through, it either encloses, or it doesnt,. so there are 2 possible answers, 0 and 2pi, 2pi if it is enclosed, 0 if it is not enclosed?
 
  • #20
Exactly
 
  • #21
Only 2 answers 0 or 2pi
 
  • #22
Nevermind, I agree with that modtor. I'm not getting any progress on (h) though.
 
  • #23
cereeal said:
What parametrization did you use for C? I tried thinking about what Dick said a few posts ago and it seems the line integral increases the more turns you go around a path so wouldn't that mean all values are possible?

And for the last question, because arctan(y/x) isn't defined on the y-axis and we know it is a potential of F, wouldn't that be the formula for the potential. I'm not sure I exactly am getting your hint Dick, but again thank you for the help.

arctan(y/x) is the angle measured from the x-axis in first quadrant. It's the negative of the angle from the x-axis in the fourth quadrant. If you patch those together then it's a continuous function for x>0. It's NOT continuous between the fourth quadrant and the third. Fundamentally, the potential function is just an angle. You just have to redefine the angle by shifting it by a constant to make it continuous except at points along the positive y axis.
 
  • #24
yeah, I can't figure out part (h) either, any ideas?

Let Ω = R2 \ {(0,y); y ≥ 0}. Find a closed form formula for the potential of F on Ω.

I don't even know where to start with this one
 
Last edited:
  • #25
If anyone else could help it would be greatly appreciated.
Would the previous arctan(y/x) function be the answer? Either way, I also do know where to start.
 
  • #26
cereeal said:
If anyone else could help it would be greatly appreciated.
Would the previous arctan(y/x) function be the answer? Either way, I also do know where to start.

arctan(y/x) is discontinuous along the negative y-axis. You want it to be continuous there. Define the potential by quadrant. You can always add or subtract pi to make the values match up there.
 

FAQ: Computing Line Integrals Related to Vector Field F in R2

What is a line integral related to a vector field in R2?

A line integral related to a vector field in R2 is a mathematical calculation used to determine the work done by a vector field along a given curve in two-dimensional space.

How do you compute a line integral related to a vector field in R2?

To compute a line integral related to a vector field in R2, you must first parameterize the given curve in terms of a single variable. Then, you can integrate the dot product of the vector field and the tangent vector of the curve over the given parameter range.

What is the significance of computing a line integral related to a vector field in R2?

Computing a line integral related to a vector field in R2 allows us to calculate the work done by a vector field along a given path, which has many applications in physics, engineering, and other fields.

What are some common techniques used to compute line integrals related to vector fields in R2?

Some common techniques used to compute line integrals related to vector fields in R2 include using the fundamental theorem of line integrals, Green's theorem, and parametrizing the curve in terms of polar coordinates.

Can line integrals related to vector fields in R2 be extended to higher dimensions?

Yes, line integrals related to vector fields can be extended to higher dimensions, such as R3 or even higher. In higher dimensions, the calculation becomes more complex, but the basic principles remain the same.

Similar threads

Back
Top