Conceptual Q - Rolling Resistance, Angular + Linear motion -const. acceleration

In summary, the conversation discusses the combination of friction and resistance properties in rolling and linear motion. It also presents a homework problem involving a solid cylinder on a horizontal surface, pulled by a force and with known variables such as mass, radius, and friction coefficient. The solution involves calculating the linear and angular acceleration of the cylinder, taking into account static friction and the rotational inertia equation. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of combined motion and suggests ways to check the validity of problem solving.
  • #1
vasra
5
0
Hello, new poster here.

I have trouble understanding some friction/resistance properties and how they are applied to rolling & linear motion simultaneously.

I've done a lot of simple static / dynamic (sliding) friction examples as well as rolling without taking into account resistance, but somehow the combination seems somewhat counter-intuitive to me.

Homework Statement



8fuao9x.png


Solid cylinder on a horizontal surface is pulled from it's center of gravity (cog = com) parallel to the surface with force [tex]F_p=150N[/tex]. See the free body diagram above. The known variables are:

[tex]R=0.53m[/tex] (radius of the cylinder end)
[tex]M=42kg[/tex] (mass of the solid cylinder)
[tex]F_p=150N[/tex] (force pulling the com of cylinder)
[tex]\mu=0.3[/tex] (friction coefficient between cylinder and surface)

Define the (linear) acceleration of the cylinder and the angular acceleration of the cylinder, when the friction coefficient between the cylinder and surface is [tex]\mu=0.3[/tex]

Personal notes

There is no specific information about:

- whether the cylinder rolls, slides or both
- friction is not identified other than being friction (assume static friction either at rest or static friction at rolling motion
- is the friction given a constant or maximum value for the friction (both static friction at rest and rolling resistance are variable : they are relative to the forces being applied)?

Homework Equations



0. In a case like this, how do I identify (or do I _have_ to identify) what the given friction coefficient means? I assume it is for static friction, but can I infer it somehow?

1. In the image above (drawn by me, may be incorrect). The direction of the rolling resistance is in the same direction as the the force pulling the cylinder, trying to cause movement, right? (this is due to the fact that the rolling should be clockwise in this case and rolling resistance should resist that clockwise motion of cylinder's surface particles when touching the level surface, effectively preventing slipping up to a point).

The Attempt at a Solution



Fix co-ordinate: Positive directions towards up and down.

Attempt 1.

[tex]\Sigma F=F_r=F_g-F_N+F_p-F_s[/tex]
The sum of forces is (resultant force): Gravity and normal forces are equal, but opposite in direction, force that pulls is resisted by the static friction force.

[tex]F_g=Mg[/tex], [tex]F_s=\mu F_N=\mu Mg[/tex], [tex]F_r=Ma[/tex]

[tex]F_r=Ma=F_p-\mu Mg \leftrightarrow a=(F_p-\mu Mg) \div M[/tex]

This gives an answer in the correct units, but I have no intuitive way of checking whether the magnitude of the answer feels realistic.

Also, somehow I'm not sure, because:

1. A dynamic (sliding) friction would indeed resist the pulling force (in a simplified case) and turn the energy into heat, sound and possible deformation (?).

2. A static friction causes the cylinder to rotate, helping to convert linear motion to angular motion. IF the static friction is transferring part of the pulling linear force to the rotation of the cylinder, but also resisting the linear motion itself (as heat loss?), then how do I separate these? Do I have to?

3. I really can't put my finger down on this, but somehow the above feels unintuitive.

I've been looking at:

- Fundamentals of physics, 8th ed (Walker)
- Conceptual Physics, 10th ed (Hewitt)
- College Physics, 7th (Serwa7)

but all the explanations are really simplistic and I can't seem to be able to understand the concept of combined linear + rolling motion w/ friction applied and thus, cannot be sure if my above FBD and subsequent calculations are anywhere correct.

BTW, from above, if it's correct, I'd continue by applying the rotational inertia equation for a solid cylinder, noting that the the friction force works as torque, which in turn is equal to the inertia times angular acceleration and from there working the angular acceleration.

On a related note:

Once I'm done and I'm not sure if I've correctly understood the situation and it's dynamics, what other ways of checking the validity of my problem solving do I have, other than:

- calculate with and check for correct units (esp. the answer)
- compare if the result is within realistic ballpark figure (sometimes really difficult, unless I'm in a lab or have access to measurement data)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Recall that friction always acts to oppose slipping between surfaces. So which way will it act?

Static friction will be whatever it needs to be to prevent slipping, up to its maximum value. (So don't just assume that friction equals [itex]\mu N[/itex].) Set up equations for rotation and translation (apply Newton's 2nd law to each) and see if there's sufficient static friction to prevent slipping. Solve for the acceleration assuming no slipping.
 
  • #3


Hello new poster,

Thank you for your question and detailed explanation of your thought process. It seems like you have a good understanding of the basic concepts of friction and linear and angular motion. However, there are a few points that I would like to clarify and expand upon.

Firstly, the given friction coefficient of 0.3 is indeed for static friction. This means that the friction force will only come into play if the object is on the verge of slipping or rolling. In this case, we can assume that the cylinder is not slipping or rolling, and therefore the friction force is equal to \mu Mg, where M is the mass of the cylinder and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

Secondly, you are correct in your understanding that the direction of the rolling resistance is in the same direction as the force pulling the cylinder. This is because the cylinder is being pulled in a horizontal direction, so the friction force will also act in a horizontal direction to prevent slipping or rolling.

In your attempt at a solution, you correctly set up the equation for the sum of forces and solved for the acceleration. However, I would like to clarify a few points:

1. The dynamic friction force will only come into play if the object is actually sliding or rolling. In this case, we are assuming that the object is not sliding or rolling, so we do not need to consider dynamic friction.

2. The static friction force does not convert linear motion into angular motion. It simply prevents the object from slipping or rolling. In this case, the force pulling the cylinder is already causing both linear and angular motion, and the static friction force is simply helping to maintain the motion of the cylinder without slipping or rolling.

3. The way to separate the linear and angular motion is by using the equations for linear and angular motion separately. In this case, you correctly used the equation F_r=Ma for linear motion and you can use the equation \tau=I\alpha for angular motion, where \tau is the torque, I is the moment of inertia, and \alpha is the angular acceleration.

To check the validity of your problem solving, you can also try to visualize the scenario in your mind and see if your solution makes sense. For example, if the acceleration you calculated is very high, it may not make sense that the cylinder is moving at such a high speed without slipping or rolling. Additionally, you can try to think about extreme cases, such as a very large or very small friction
 

FAQ: Conceptual Q - Rolling Resistance, Angular + Linear motion -const. acceleration

What is rolling resistance?

Rolling resistance is the force that opposes the motion of a rolling object, such as a wheel or ball, on a surface. It is caused by the deformation of the object and the friction between the object and the surface it is rolling on.

How does rolling resistance affect the motion of an object?

Rolling resistance reduces the speed of an object and requires a constant force to maintain its motion. This results in a decrease in the object's velocity and acceleration.

What is the difference between angular motion and linear motion?

Angular motion is the movement of an object around an axis, while linear motion is the movement of an object in a straight line. Angular motion is typically described in terms of rotational speed and acceleration, while linear motion is described in terms of velocity and acceleration.

How does constant acceleration affect the motion of an object?

Constant acceleration means that an object's velocity is changing at a constant rate. This results in a change in the object's position that is directly proportional to the square of the time. In other words, the object's motion becomes increasingly faster over time.

What is the relationship between angular and linear motion in the presence of constant acceleration?

In the case of constant acceleration, the angular speed of an object is directly proportional to its linear speed. As the object moves faster in a linear direction, it also rotates faster around its axis. This relationship is known as the conservation of angular momentum.

Back
Top