Conditions on random variable to satisfy limit property

  • #1
jjhyun90
8
0

Homework Statement


The problem is to find sufficient and preferably also necessary conditions on random variable X such that its characteristic function g(x) satisfies the limit property:
[itex]\lim_{t\to0}\frac{1-g(\lambda t)}{1-g(t)}=\lambda^2[/itex]
I may assume X is symmetric around 0, so the characteristic function is real and even.

Homework Equations


[itex]g(t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{itx}f_{X}(x) dx[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm stuck immediately after trying to apply l'Hopital's rule. Any suggestions would be helpful.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is the value of [itex]g(0)[/itex]?
 
  • #3
[itex]g(0)=1[/itex] since it is a characteristic function.
 
  • #4
So, what can you say about your limit? Can you evaluate it?
 
  • #5
Using l'Hopital's rule and chain rule, the equivalent condition I need will be
[itex]\lim_{t\to0}\frac{g'(\lambda t)}{g'(t)} = \lambda [/itex].
 
  • #6
jjhyun90 said:
Using l'Hopital's rule and chain rule, the equivalent condition I need will be
[itex]\lim_{t\to0}\frac{g'(\lambda t)}{g'(t)} = \lambda [/itex].

Not really, evaluate these derivatives explicitly:

[tex]
\frac{d}{d t} \left(1 - g(\lambda t)\right)
[/tex]

[tex]
\frac{d}{d t} \left(1 - g(t)\right)
[/tex]
 
  • #7
I must be confused. If I'm not mistaken, the first evaluates to [itex]-\lambda g'(\lambda t)[/itex] and the second [itex]-g'(t)[/itex].
 
  • #8
True, so your limit becomes:

[tex]
\lim_{t \rightarrow 0}{\frac{-\lambda g'(\lambda t)}{-g'(t)}} = \lambda \, \lim_{t \rightarrow}{\frac{g'(\lambda t)}{g'(t)}}
[/tex]

Before you run in evaluating this limit, you need to consider two cases:

1) [itex]g'(0) \neq 0[/itex]. Then the limit is simply 1 and you get the result you posted in post #5. However, this is not what you have in the condition of the problem.

2) [itex]g'(0) = 0[/itex] What is the limit in this case?

BTW, what does [itex]g'(0)[/itex] mean?
 
  • #9
The condition I posted on #5 is what I desire to have, rather than what will follow from the assumption. Sorry for the confusion.
By the assumption that X is symmetric around 0 and thus its expected value is 0, it follows g'(0)=0, so it is necessary to use l'Hopital's rule again.
Thus it seems a sufficient condition is that 0 < var(X) < infinity. Please let me know if I am wrong, but otherwise thank you for your help!
 
  • #10
Yes, you are correct.
 
Back
Top