In general, a cone is stronger than a cylinder in a landslide. This is because a cone has a more stable base and distributes the weight more evenly, whereas a cylinder has a flat base and can easily roll or tip over in a landslide.
The main factors that contribute to the collapse of a cone or cylinder in a landslide are the shape of the object, the material it is made of, and the force and direction of the landslide. A cone with a wider base and made of stronger materials will be more resistant to collapse than a cylinder with a flat base and weaker materials.
The angle of the slope can greatly impact the collapse of a cone or cylinder in a landslide. A steeper slope will exert more force on the object and increase the likelihood of collapse, whereas a gentler slope will exert less force and may allow the object to remain upright.
Yes, the size of the cone or cylinder can play a role in its collapse in a landslide. A larger object will have more weight and surface area to withstand the force of the landslide, whereas a smaller object may be more easily swept away or tipped over.
Yes, there have been several real-life examples of both cones and cylinders collapsing in landslides. In 2017, a large cone-shaped hill collapsed in a landslide in Shenzhen, China, causing multiple deaths and destruction. In 1982, a large cylinder-shaped oil tank collapsed in a landslide in Staten Island, New York, causing a major environmental disaster.
