Confirmation of irrational proof

In summary: What do you think Ray trick myself again?In summary, the conversation discusses a proof for the irrationality of ##\sqrt n##. The attempted proof assumes that ##p^2/q^2 = n## is an irreducible fraction and shows that this leads to a contradiction unless n is not a perfect square. However, the proof is incomplete and requires further explanation and clarification.
  • #1
Jbreezy
582
0

Homework Statement



Prove ##\sqrt n## is irrational

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution





Assume ## p^2/q^2 = n ## is an irreducible fraction.
If ##p^2 = nq^2##, then q is a multiple of n. Call this ##p' = nq##
substituting this for our original equation. We get ##p'^2 = nq^2##
Implies ##(nq)^2 = nq^2## thus our original assumption is false.

Is this horse crap? Don't just give it away if it is wrong please just indicate where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Where does this proof fail if ##n=4##?
 
  • #3
Jbreezy said:

Homework Statement



Prove ##\sqrt n## is irrational

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution





Assume ## p^2/q^2 = n ## is an irreducible fraction.
If ##p^2 = nq^2##, then q is a multiple of n. Call this ##p' = nq##
substituting this for our original equation. We get ##p'^2 = nq^2##
Implies ##(nq)^2 = nq^2## thus our original assumption is false.

Is this horse crap? Don't just give it away if it is wrong please just indicate where I went wrong.
Does it bother you at all that the statement you claim to have proved is NOT true? What if, say, n= 4? What happens to your proof in that case?

It is, of course, true if you add the requirement that n is NOT a "perfect square". How have you used that requirement in your proof?
 
  • #4
micromass said:
Where does this proof fail if ##n=4##?

Would if fail with this assumption right off the bat?

Assume ##p/q = \sqrt4 ## is an irreducible fraction.
Because ## p/q = 2 ##
 
  • #5
Jbreezy said:
Would if fail with this assumption right off the bat?

Assume ##p/q = \sqrt4 ## is an irreducible fraction.
Because ## p/q = 2 ##

OK, so your proof does fail for some ##n##. Your proof should make this clear.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #6
Yeah, I should of just included the condition because it was given in the book just excluded it in my post.
Thanks for the help
 
  • #7
Jbreezy said:

Homework Statement



Prove ##\sqrt n## is irrational

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution





Assume ## p^2/q^2 = n ## is an irreducible fraction.
If ##p^2 = nq^2##, then q is a multiple of n. Call this ##p' = nq##
substituting this for our original equation. We get ##p'^2 = nq^2##
Implies ##(nq)^2 = nq^2## thus our original assumption is false.

Is this horse crap? Don't just give it away if it is wrong please just indicate where I went wrong.

Your argument is incomplete. Essentially, you claim that if p^2 is divisible by n then p itself is also divisible by n. You cannot just say it---you need to prove it.

BTW: it is not always true for all integers n, so something about n needs to be specified.
 
  • #8
Ray Vickson said:
Your argument is incomplete. Essentially, you claim that if p^2 is divisible by n then p itself is also divisible by n. You cannot just say it---you need to prove it.

BTW: it is not always true for all integers n, so something about n needs to be specified.

Yeah, I fooled myself. Let's see if I did it again. What about:

##p/q = \sqrt n ##, Assume ## (p,q) = 1 ## and ##n ## is not a perfect square.

Squaring, we have, ## p^2 = nq^2 ##


If ## n=/= 1## There exists a prime integer ## k## such that ## k/n##

Substitution gives:

## p^2 = (n/k)q^2. ## Implies that ## kp^2 = nq^2 ## and since we know that that k divides n, ##p^2 ## and ## q^2 ## share a common factor.Thus, our assumption ## (p,q) = 1 ## is false so ## \sqrt n ## is irrational.


What do you think Ray trick myself again?
 
  • #9
This is crap. I need to think
 

FAQ: Confirmation of irrational proof

1. What is a confirmation of irrational proof?

A confirmation of irrational proof is the process of verifying or providing evidence for a proof that cannot be expressed as a rational number. This means that the proof involves irrational numbers, such as pi or the square root of 2.

2. How is a confirmation of irrational proof different from a confirmation of rational proof?

A confirmation of irrational proof involves verifying a proof that contains irrational numbers, while a confirmation of rational proof involves verifying a proof that only contains rational numbers. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction, while rational numbers can be expressed as a ratio of two integers.

3. Why is it important to confirm irrational proofs?

Confirming irrational proofs is important because it allows us to validate the validity of mathematical concepts and theories that involve irrational numbers. It also helps us to better understand the properties and relationships of these numbers.

4. What are some common techniques used to confirm irrational proofs?

Some common techniques used to confirm irrational proofs include proof by contradiction, proof by induction, and proof by construction. These techniques involve using logic and deductive reasoning to demonstrate the validity of the proof.

5. Are there any limitations to confirming irrational proofs?

Yes, there are limitations to confirming irrational proofs. These proofs can be complex and difficult to verify, and there may be gaps or errors in the logic used. Additionally, some irrational proofs may be so abstract that they cannot be confirmed through empirical evidence or experimentation.

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
866
Replies
5
Views
982
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top