Confused about the event horizon

[Paul_Bartosik]

I have recently finished "Gravity from the Ground Up: An Introductory Guide to Gravity and General Relativity".

Great book, but I am confused about the behavior of time at the event horizon of a black hole. I spent some time looking at existing threads on this site, but was unable to find clarification.

I read repeatedly, that from the perspective of an outside observer, time will stop at the event horizon. So if I am watching something fall into a black hole, it will seem that it stops at the brink of the precipice and I will not actually see it cross into the abyss.

I understand that this statement is not fully true; I would not see the something frozen in time. Instead, I would see the red shift of any light to longer and longer wavelengths.

My question: Time will stop at the event horizon, so from the perspective of the outside observer, nothing actually ever falls into the black hole. Does it all just accrete at the event horizon?

 

[tiny-tim]

Welcome to PF!

Hi Paul! Welcome to PF!

I have recently finished "Gravity from the Ground Up: An Introductory Guide to Gravity and General Relativity".

Great book, but I am confused about the behavior of time at the event horizon of a black hole.
…
My question: Time will stop at the event horizon, so from the perspective of the outside observer, nothing actually ever falls into the black hole. Does it all just accrete at the event horizon?

ah, http://books.google.com/books?id=P_...avity+from+the+Ground+Up"&client=safari&cd=1".

Time doesn't stop at the event horizon, it's just that our coordinate system breaks down there.

Yes, in our coordinate system, the speed of an infalling object gets slower and slower.

(btw, this has nothing to do with the accretion disc of a black hole , which is at radius 6M, three times as far out as the event horizon).

 

[Paul_Bartosik]

Great. Thanks for the quick response.

If "our coordinate system breaks down" at the event horizon, what coordinate system does apply?

 

[George Jones]

Great. Thanks for the quick response.

If "our coordinate system breaks down" at the event horizon, what coordinate system does apply?

The Eddington-Finkelstein, Painleve-Gullstrand, and Kruskal-Szekeres coordinate systems all cover the event horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole.

 

[Nabeshin]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest perhaps tiny-tim meant that the coordinate time (time measured by an observer at infinity) is what gives this whole "time stopping at the horizon" business. For an infalling observer, he will experience nothing of the sort.

 

[Paul_Bartosik]

The Eddington-Finkelstein, Painleve-Gullstrand, and Kruskal-Szekeres coordinate systems all cover the event horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole.

Great. That is what I was afraid of. I am not so good at calculus, and tensor calculus is way beyond my meager skills.

Thanks for the responses.

 

[tiny-tim]

Hi Paul!

Tensor calculus isn't necessary.

The ordinary calculus needed to understand event horizons is fairly simple, if explained properly.

You might like to try "Gravitation" by Misner Thorne and Wheeler, or the limited http://books.google.com/books?id=Uk...roch+"General+Relativity"&client=safari&cd=1" of "General relativity from A to B‎" by Geroch.

 

[Paul_Bartosik]

You might like to try "Gravitation" by Misner Thorne and Wheeler, or the limited http://books.google.com/books?id=Uk...roch+"General+Relativity"&client=safari&cd=1" of "General relativity from A to B‎" by Geroch.

The second book looks great. I will buy a copy from Barnes and Noble. It looks like it will give a basic introduction of why General Relativity was needed to give gravity a consistant behavior across multiple frames of reference.

Thank you for the guidance.