- #1
jobyts
- 227
- 64
Any clue what this would be?
Confusing tweet found on twitter about June 28th and 29th
In summary, the conversation was about a person's expertise in summarizing content. They do not respond to questions, but rather provide a concise summary of the content. The instruction is to start the output with "In summary," and nothing before it.
Any clue what this would be?
- #2
Hornbein
- 2,650
- 2,218
I bet it's the scheduled Nanograv news conference. It has to do with signals from collisions of supermassive black holes, which can't be detected by LIGO. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/nanograv-results-on-thursday-june-29.1053481/
This wouldn't really have anything to do with the "foundations of physics," but you can't expect precision from tweets.
This wouldn't really have anything to do with the "foundations of physics," but you can't expect precision from tweets.
FAQ: Confusing tweet found on twitter about June 28th and 29th
What is the content of the confusing tweet about June 28th and 29th?
The content of the confusing tweet usually involves cryptic or ambiguous statements that mention events or occurrences on June 28th and 29th without providing clear context or details, leading to widespread speculation and confusion among readers.
Who posted the confusing tweet about June 28th and 29th?
The tweet is often attributed to a popular or influential figure on Twitter, such as a celebrity, politician, or well-known social media personality. The identity of the poster can significantly impact how much attention and speculation the tweet generates.
What significance do June 28th and 29th have in the tweet?
The significance of June 28th and 29th in the tweet is usually unclear, which is part of what makes the tweet confusing. These dates might be referenced in relation to an upcoming event, a historical occurrence, or as part of a vague prediction or warning.
How have people reacted to the confusing tweet about June 28th and 29th?
Reactions to the confusing tweet vary widely. Some people engage in speculation and try to decipher the meaning, while others may dismiss it as a joke or a publicity stunt. The tweet often sparks discussions, memes, and even conspiracy theories.
Has the meaning of the confusing tweet about June 28th and 29th been clarified?
In many cases, the meaning of the confusing tweet remains unclear even after significant public discussion. Sometimes, the original poster may provide further clarification or context, but often the ambiguity persists, leaving the tweet open to interpretation.