Confusion about variables in polar coordinates

In summary, "Confusion about variables in polar coordinates" discusses the common misunderstandings related to the use of polar coordinates in mathematics and physics. It highlights how the representation of points in polar coordinates, defined by a radius and an angle, can lead to ambiguity in calculations, especially when converting to Cartesian coordinates or interpreting the meaning of the variables. The article emphasizes the importance of clarity in notation and understanding the relationships between the coordinate systems to avoid errors in analysis and problem-solving.
  • #1
sdfsfasdfasf
75
12
Homework Statement
x
Relevant Equations
x
1716208764644.png

My confusion refers to this question above.

If I were to ask you, what is the equation of the radial line, what would you say? I know that the general equation the radial line with cartesian gradient of m has an equation of θ = arctan(m). Clearly here the angle between the radial line and initial line is θ, therefore the equation is θ = θ? That can't be right, do we call the angle θ a different name, like α? Then we'd have θ = α, which seems better. How does this get around the problem?
Things like this don't really confuse me usually, can someone help me out here? Is it bad writing from the author?

Thank you for reading
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sdfsfasdfasf said:
Homework Statement: x
Relevant Equations: x

If I were to ask you, what is the equation of the radial line, what would you say?
I'd say, θ = const.
 
  • Like
Likes Mark44
  • #3
Just to add: This is the polar coordinate equivalent of writing the equation for a line parallel to the x-axis in Cartesian coordinates, which is just ##y =## constant.
 
  • Like
Likes Mark44
Back
Top