Confusion when considering pV=nRT in Two Balloon experiment

In summary: Yes, the explanation should include the changing thickness, and the radius of curvature of the membrane.
  • #1
phantomvommand
282
39
This is the Two-Balloon Experiment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-balloon_experiment#cite_note-MW78-1

Screenshot 2022-07-02 at 11.24.49 PM.png

The claim on Wikipedia which I am a little confused over is that when 2 balloons (at the 2 red points) are connected via a tube, the smaller balloon at a higher pressure would push air into the larger balloon. Eventually, the pressure should become equal in both balloons.

My first question is this:
According to the article, the "pressure" that must become equal eventually is the pressure in the rubber of the balloon. However, shouldn't it be the pressure of the air in the 2 balloons?

Assuming that equal rubber pressure implies equal air pressure,
considering the system as a whole:
P1V1 + P2V2 must be equal to P(V1 + V2), where P is the final equal air pressure. However, P1 > P and P2 > P, so the equality cannot hold. (LHS > RHS)

I understand that I have not accounted for the changes in energy when the rubber balloons acquire a more stable state (at lower pressure). But if this were accounted for, we can see that:
U1 + U2 + Rubber energy initial = U3 + Rubber energy final, where U1, U2, and U3 are the internal energies of the air in the small balloon, bigger balloon and final state.
Since U1, U2, U3 are analogous to P1V1, P1V2, and P(V1+V2), and rubber energy final > initial, LHS > RHS.

Where have I gone wrong?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
phantomvommand said:
However, shouldn't it be the pressure of the air in the 2 balloons?
True. Once the two balloons have equilibrated, there is only one volume, so the air pressure in the two balloons must be equal. The radii of the balloons will be different, as will be the tension in the rubber.
phantomvommand said:
Assuming that equal rubber pressure implies equal air pressure, considering the system as a whole:
That is a false assumption.
The balloon radius of curvature relates the air pressure to the tension in the rubber material.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
  • #3
Baluncore said:
The radii of the balloons will be different, as will be the tension in the rubber.
However, the wiki article seems to suggest that the final tension in the rubber will become equal.
<The air flow ceases when the two balloons have equal pressure, with one on the left branch of the pressure curve (r<rp) and one on the right branch (r>rp)>

rp refers to the peak rubber pressure in my original post.
 
  • #4
phantomvommand said:
<The air flow ceases when the two balloons have equal pressure, with one on the left branch of the pressure curve (r<rp) and one on the right branch (r>rp)>
The surface tension in the rubber balloon opposes the difference between internal and external air pressure. The rubber membrane has no pressure, it has tension.
Surface tension in the rubber, is perpendicular to the differential air pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
  • #5
Baluncore said:
The surface tension in the rubber balloon opposes the difference between internal and external air pressure. The rubber membrane has no pressure, it has tension.
Surface tension in the rubber, is perpendicular to the differential air pressure.
So the graph is actually the pressure of air in the balloon as it expands?

However, explanations online all claim that the graph represents the tension in the rubber...

And if it is the pressure of air in the balloon, then:
considering the system as a whole:
P1V1 + P2V2 must be equal to P(V1 + V2), where P is the final equal air pressure. However, P1 > P and P2 > P, so the equality cannot hold. (LHS > RHS)
 
  • #6
phantomvommand said:
P1V1 + P2V2 must be equal to P(V1 + V2), ...
I do not think so.
The final volume is V, not (V1 + V2). V will be greater than (V1 + V2), since high pressure air from the smaller balloon will expand as it migrates to the larger, lower pressure balloon.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
  • #7
Baluncore said:
I do not think so.
The final volume is V, not (V1 + V2). V will be greater than (V1 + V2), since high pressure air from the smaller balloon will expand as it migrates to the larger, lower pressure balloon.
Thanks for this.

Would my interpretation of the graph as follows be correct:

- the graph actually depicts the air pressure in the balloon.
- the explanation of the air pressure is due to the material properties of rubber (stiff at first — where the increase in number of moles of air leads to P being the main variable increased, but then at some point when rubber expands more easily, V accounts for the main increase in nRT, while P in fact decreases but PV as a whole increases)
 
  • #8
phantomvommand said:
- the graph actually depicts the air pressure in the balloon.
Correct. The pressure is plotted against the relative radius of the balloon.

The explanation should include the changing thickness, and the radius of curvature of the membrane.
 

FAQ: Confusion when considering pV=nRT in Two Balloon experiment

What is the purpose of the Two Balloon experiment?

The Two Balloon experiment is used to demonstrate the relationship between pressure, volume, temperature, and number of moles of a gas. It helps to illustrate the ideal gas law, which states that the product of pressure and volume is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas and the temperature.

How does the Two Balloon experiment work?

In the experiment, two balloons are connected to each other with a tube. One balloon is filled with a known amount of gas, while the other balloon is empty. The balloons are then placed in a container of hot water, causing the gas inside them to expand. As the gas expands, the pressure and volume change, allowing for the ideal gas law to be observed.

What causes the confusion when considering pV=nRT in the Two Balloon experiment?

The confusion often arises because the ideal gas law is typically written as pV=nRT, where p is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles, R is the gas constant, and T is temperature. However, in the Two Balloon experiment, the volume of the gas is not constant, as it is affected by the expansion of the balloons. This can lead to discrepancies in the calculations and confusion about the application of the ideal gas law.

How can the confusion be resolved in the Two Balloon experiment?

To resolve the confusion, it is important to recognize that the ideal gas law is only applicable to closed systems where the volume remains constant. In the Two Balloon experiment, the volume is not constant, so the ideal gas law cannot be directly applied. Instead, the experiment can be used to demonstrate the relationship between pressure, volume, temperature, and number of moles of gas, but the ideal gas law should not be used for calculations.

What are some potential sources of error in the Two Balloon experiment?

Some potential sources of error in the Two Balloon experiment include temperature fluctuations, air leaks in the balloons or tube, and inaccuracies in measuring the volume of the balloons. Additionally, the ideal gas law is an approximation and may not perfectly describe the behavior of all gases, which can also contribute to errors in the experiment.

Similar threads

Back
Top