Conservation of Energy by a Rolling Sphere

Click For Summary
A rolling ball with an initial velocity reaches a hill, flies off a cliff, and lands at the same height, raising questions about energy conservation. Despite the final diagonal velocity being greater than the initial horizontal velocity, the total energy remains conserved, as kinetic and potential energy combined must stay constant. The increase in kinetic energy upon landing cannot be explained by a change in potential energy since the height remains the same. The discussion also touches on the confusion regarding terms like "diagonal velocity" and the phrasing of the problem. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the principles of energy conservation and the complexities involved in analyzing motion.
lapo3399
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rolling ball traveling horizontally with a certain initial translational velocity comes to a hill with a defined height. Upon reaching the top, it flies off of a cliff and falls to the ground and ends up at the same relative height that it began at. If the final diagonal velocity upon hitting the ground is greater than the initial horizontal velocity, has the ball gained energy? Explain.

2. The attempt at a solution
It is impossible for the ball to have gained overall energy, as the sum of kinetic and potential energy is always maintained. In this case, kinetic energy includes rotational and translational energy. I do not understand what has happened exactly, however, as the change in potential energy must be zero as the height did not change overall, so the total change in velocity must be solely attributed to kinetic energy. This means, however, that energy emerged from somewhere, which does not make sense. I guess this could have something to do with conservation of momentum, but I am not exactly sure how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "diagonal velocity"? What sort of English is "it flies off of"? Is this the full problem as set or has it been paraphrased?
 
Roll a ball up an incline and what happens? What happens to the motion - translational and rotational?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
878
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K