Contact Mechanics: Deformation of a ball on a surface

In summary, "Contact Mechanics: Deformation of a ball on a surface" explores how a ball deforms when it makes contact with a surface, analyzing the stress and strain distribution at the contact interface. The study examines factors such as material properties, contact geometry, and loading conditions, utilizing mathematical models to predict the extent of deformation. It highlights the significance of understanding these interactions in various applications, including engineering and material science, to optimize performance and prevent failure.
  • #1
phantomvommand
282
39
Homework Statement
See picture below
Relevant Equations
Y = Stress / Strain
A solid ball of radius R, density ρ, and Young’s modulus Y rests on a hard table. Because of its weight, it deforms slightly, so that the area in contact with the table is a circle of radius r. Estimate r, assuming that it is much smaller than R.
Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 1.35.49 AM.png


Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 1.36.19 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 1.36.41 AM.png


I have no issues understanding the estimation of stress, but the estimation of strain greatly confuses me.

1. How did the author know that "at heights greater than r, the pressure will be smaller"? Isn't r a horizontal quantity? What does it have to do with heights?

2. "Since stress is proportional to strain, that means that the part of the ball that is significantly strained has height r." Again, how does this have anything to do with r, given that r is a horizontal quantity and that the strain is vertical (ish).

3. Even if assuming that the previous 2 claims are true, how was the equation ##\frac {\delta} {r} \sim \frac {r} {R}## obtained?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
phantomvommand said:
1. How did the author know that "at heights greater than r, the pressure will be smaller"? Isn't r a horizontal quantity? What does it have to do with heights?
At height r above the flat base, the radius is ##\sqrt{2r\sqrt{R^2-r^2}}## (check my algebra). If r<<R that's about ##\sqrt{2Rr}##. The author is taking that as constituting a value significantly greater than r.
phantomvommand said:
3. Even if assuming that the previous 2 claims are true, how was the equation ##\frac {\delta} {r} \sim \frac {r} {R}## obtained?
In the diagram, the total extent of compression is ##\delta=R-\sqrt{R^2-r^2}\approx \frac{r^2}{2R}##.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
  • #3
haruspex said:
At height r above the flat base, the radius is ##\sqrt{2r\sqrt{R^2-r^2}}## (check my algebra). If r<<R that's about ##\sqrt{2Rr}##. The author is taking that as constituting a value significantly greater than r.

In the diagram, the total extent of compression is ##\delta=R-\sqrt{R^2-r^2}\approx \frac{r^2}{2R}##.
But how does ##\sqrt {2Rr} >> r## mean that pressures at heights above r will be smaller?

Sorry, I wasnt clear about my final question. It should be why ##strain \sim \frac {\delta} {r}##. But I suppose if the claim that pressures above r are substantially smaller, then r will be the effective length used in calculation of strain, instead of the more obvious R?
 
  • #4
phantomvommand said:
But how does ##\sqrt {2Rr} >> r## mean that pressures at heights above r will be smaller?
It is not that there is anything magic about the height being less than or more than r.
At the base, the force is spread over area ##\pi r^2##. At height r it is spread over ##2\pi Rr##. If R>>r then ##Rr>>r^2##. Therefore the stress is significantly less by the time you get to that height.
phantomvommand said:
Sorry, I wasnt clear about my final question. It should be why ##strain \sim \frac {\delta} {r}##. But I suppose if the claim that pressures above r are substantially smaller, then r will be the effective length used in calculation of strain, instead of the more obvious R?
Yes, that is the reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand

Similar threads

Back
Top