Continuous Surface Charge Source - Integral Confusion

In summary, the homework problem involves finding the total charge on a circular disc of radius ρ = a, where the charge density is given by ρs = ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin2 φ C/m2. The limits of integration are from 0 to a for ρ and 0 to 2π for φ. The charge, Q, is calculated using the equation Q = ∫∫ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin^2 (φ) dφdρ, where ρ is used as both a coordinate and a charge density. The element for area, dS, is given by dS = ρdφdρ in polar coordinates.
  • #1
technicolour1
7
0
1. Homework Statement
Find the total charge on a circular disc of radius ρ = a if the charge density is given by
ρs = ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin2 φ C/m2 where ρs0 is a constant.
Are the two limits of integration from 0 -> a for ρ and 0->2∏ for φ? In the example given in the notes, ρ varies, instead of being a constant value. Does this mean that I cannot integrate ρ in this problem?


2. Homework Equations

Q = ∫ρdS

3. The Attempt at a Solution

Q = ∫∫ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin^2 (φ) dφdρ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
technicolour1 said:
1. Homework Statement
Find the total charge on a circular disc of radius ρ = a if the charge density is given by
ρs = ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin2 φ C/m2 where ρs0 is a constant.
Are the two limits of integration from 0 -> a for ρ and 0->2∏ for φ? In the example given in the notes, ρ varies, instead of being a constant value. Does this mean that I cannot integrate ρ in this problem?

2. Homework Equations

Q = ∫ρdS   (This is the surface density ρ.)

3. The Attempt at a Solution

Q = ∫∫ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin^2 (φ) dφdρ...
You have the Greek letter rho, ρ, used in two very different ways here.

ρ as a coordinate: This is the role usually player by the letter, r, in polar coordinates.

ρ as (surface) charge density: Here ρ seems to be accompanied by what looks like should be a subscript. ρs and ρs0.

Yes, the limits of integration are as you indicate.

The charge density, ρs, is a function of the coordinate, ρ. (somewhat confusing).

For polar coordinates, the element (differential) for area, dS, is given by: [itex]\displaystyle dS=\rho\,d\varphi\,d\rho\,.[/itex]

Other than that, you seem to be on the right track.
 

FAQ: Continuous Surface Charge Source - Integral Confusion

What is a continuous surface charge source?

A continuous surface charge source is a hypothetical concept used in electromagnetism to model the behavior of a charged surface. It represents an infinitely thin sheet of charge with a uniform charge density.

How is a continuous surface charge source different from a point charge?

A point charge is a single charge located at a specific point in space, while a continuous surface charge source is an infinitely thin sheet of charge. A point charge has a concentrated charge, while a continuous surface charge source has a uniform charge distribution.

What is the integral confusion associated with continuous surface charge sources?

The integral confusion refers to the difficulty in applying the concept of integration to calculate the electric field or potential due to a continuous surface charge source. This is because the charge density of a continuous surface charge source is infinite, making the integral equation impossible to solve.

How is the integral confusion resolved in practical applications?

In practical applications, the integral confusion is resolved by considering the continuous surface charge source as a limiting case of a uniformly charged disk or ring. This allows for the use of well-defined equations to calculate the electric field or potential.

What are some real-life examples of continuous surface charge sources?

Some examples of continuous surface charge sources include charged metal plates, conductive coatings on electronic devices, and the surface of a charged balloon or Van de Graaff generator. These are all examples of surfaces with a uniform charge distribution.

Back
Top