- #1
McQueen
- 256
- 0
Conventions !
The experiments on the interaction of a conductor carrying a
current and a magnetic field conducted by Oersted more than
two hundred years ago , have resulted in conventions that
unfortunately are still colouring our perceptions of how
exactly the electromagnetic field around a wire carrying
a current is configured. Even when we have the means of
verifying the truth or falsity of these perceptions we have
failed to put right many of the previously drawn hypotheses ,
which a cursory examination show to be false. For instance to take one of the most damaging hypotheses on which practically the whole foundation of electromagnetism rests. Let us take the field due to a flow of current in a straight conductor. We have been told that in
such a case the magnetic field , exists at right angle
to the conductor , this is patently false. An examination of
Fig1. Shows the experiment which was conducted to show that the magnetic field exists at right angles to the conductor. Fig 1.http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/id3.html Even a little bit of thought shows that this must be wrong , these concentric circles exist at every point along the length of the conductor ,
they would obviously taper off towards the positive and
negative poles , thus the electromagnetic field around a
conductor; must in fact resemble the field around a bar
magnet. As shown in Fig 2http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/id3.html It can easily be proven , by a simple experiment that a
compass placed in this field would undergo not the tangential deflection seen in Fig 1.but would align with the lines of force in a north south direction.Thus it can be rationalized , even without resource to practical experiments , that the electromagnetic
field around a straight conductor carrying a current is a
solenoidal field. An argument might be made that the field
seen in Fig 2, describes the electrical field around the conductor and not the magnetic field but this is superfluous , since the field around the conductor is seen to be indistinguishable from that generated around a permanent bar magnet. Therefore the theory put
forward by New Field Theory or "Aumic" theory that the "lines
of force " observed around a conductor carrying an electrical
current are in fact lines of linked photons which originate at
the negative pole , flow through the conductor , leave the
conductor at the positive pole , travel through the space
surrounding the conductor and re-enter the conductor at the
negative end , resulting in a continuous loop of energy, in
and around the conductor , is substantiated. It is also
conclusively proved that the electromagnetic field around the
conductor is not as has hitherto been believed emanating at
right angles to the conductor . Fig 3http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/id3.html
Fig 3. According to the theory proposed by Oersted and the convention still followed today if we were to view the lines of force
around an electrical conductor laid flat on the page , then
the lines of force would be represented by the dots shown in
Fig 3. i.e they would be coming vertically through the paper. A simple experiment shows that this is not true , if iron filings are sprinkled around a conductor positioned as shown in, the iron filings should stand on end (b) be localised around the points indicated . What we see in fact is neither of these two phenomena , what we see is the type of formation indicated in Fig 2.
The experiments on the interaction of a conductor carrying a
current and a magnetic field conducted by Oersted more than
two hundred years ago , have resulted in conventions that
unfortunately are still colouring our perceptions of how
exactly the electromagnetic field around a wire carrying
a current is configured. Even when we have the means of
verifying the truth or falsity of these perceptions we have
failed to put right many of the previously drawn hypotheses ,
which a cursory examination show to be false. For instance to take one of the most damaging hypotheses on which practically the whole foundation of electromagnetism rests. Let us take the field due to a flow of current in a straight conductor. We have been told that in
such a case the magnetic field , exists at right angle
to the conductor , this is patently false. An examination of
Fig1. Shows the experiment which was conducted to show that the magnetic field exists at right angles to the conductor. Fig 1.http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/id3.html Even a little bit of thought shows that this must be wrong , these concentric circles exist at every point along the length of the conductor ,
they would obviously taper off towards the positive and
negative poles , thus the electromagnetic field around a
conductor; must in fact resemble the field around a bar
magnet. As shown in Fig 2http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/id3.html It can easily be proven , by a simple experiment that a
compass placed in this field would undergo not the tangential deflection seen in Fig 1.but would align with the lines of force in a north south direction.Thus it can be rationalized , even without resource to practical experiments , that the electromagnetic
field around a straight conductor carrying a current is a
solenoidal field. An argument might be made that the field
seen in Fig 2, describes the electrical field around the conductor and not the magnetic field but this is superfluous , since the field around the conductor is seen to be indistinguishable from that generated around a permanent bar magnet. Therefore the theory put
forward by New Field Theory or "Aumic" theory that the "lines
of force " observed around a conductor carrying an electrical
current are in fact lines of linked photons which originate at
the negative pole , flow through the conductor , leave the
conductor at the positive pole , travel through the space
surrounding the conductor and re-enter the conductor at the
negative end , resulting in a continuous loop of energy, in
and around the conductor , is substantiated. It is also
conclusively proved that the electromagnetic field around the
conductor is not as has hitherto been believed emanating at
right angles to the conductor . Fig 3http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/id3.html
Fig 3. According to the theory proposed by Oersted and the convention still followed today if we were to view the lines of force
around an electrical conductor laid flat on the page , then
the lines of force would be represented by the dots shown in
Fig 3. i.e they would be coming vertically through the paper. A simple experiment shows that this is not true , if iron filings are sprinkled around a conductor positioned as shown in, the iron filings should stand on end (b) be localised around the points indicated . What we see in fact is neither of these two phenomena , what we see is the type of formation indicated in Fig 2.
Last edited: