Convergence of a geometric series

In summary, the conversation discusses a confusion about the convergence of two summation series in an economics paper. The equations in question are corrected and a proof is provided for one of the equations. The conversation ends with a thank you message from Manfred.
  • #1
Manfred1999
5
0
Hi everyone,

I am generally familiar with convergent series. However, in one economics paper (Becker&Tomes 1979), I found the following that confuses me:$$\sum_{j=0}^{k} \beta^{j} h^{k-j} = \beta^{k}(k+1)\quad \text{if} \quad\beta =h$$

however,

$$\sum_{j=0}^{k} \beta^{j} j^{k-j} = \frac{\beta^{k+1}-h^{k+1}}{\beta-h}\text{if} \quad\beta \ne h$$In short, I do not understand how they derived at these convergences. Who has any idea that are they referring to? The text itself does not provide more information. And despite having consulted those maths references I can access, I could not find an answer.

Thank you very much for any hint.

Man

PS
I hope the formulae are depicted properly
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi Manfred1999,

I corrected the formatting of the equations you presented, and I hope what you see is what you intended to write. But, in the first equation, you did not complete the condition on $\beta$; $\beta$ equals what exactly?
 
  • #3
Hi Euge,

Thanks so much for doing this. Much appreciated. I think now I know what I did do wrong. I forgot the $ signs. Also, I did not notice that the conditions where not depicted properly. I hope it is clear now. Do you have any idea how do prove the convergence of the series in both cases? Maybe I should that k goes to \infty!
Man
Euge said:
Hi Manfred1999,

I corrected the formatting of the equations you presented, and I hope what you see is what you intended to write. But, in the first equation, you did not complete the condition on $\beta$; $\beta$ equals what exactly?
 
  • #4
I am an idiot! I just solved the case case. The one where beta goes to infinity! I am an idiot. I am happy to jot down my steps if that helps!

Manfred1999 said:
Hi Euge,

Thanks so much for doing this. Much appreciated. I think now I know what I did do wrong. I forgot the $ signs. Also, I did not notice that the conditions where not depicted properly. I hope it is clear now. Do you have any idea how do prove the convergence of the series in both cases? Maybe I should that k goes to \infty!
Man
 
  • #5
Manfred1999 said:
$$\sum_{j=0}^{k} \beta^{j} j^{k-j} = \frac{\beta^{k+1}-h^{k+1}}{\beta-h}\quad\text{if} \quad\beta \ne h$$

The expressions $j^{k-j}$ should be $h^{k-j}$. To prove the corrected formula, perform synthetic division. Alternatively, multiply the sum $\sum\limits_{j = 0}^n \beta^j h^{k-j}$ by $\beta - h$; this gives

$$(\beta - h)\sum_{j = 0}^k \beta^j h^{k-j} = \sum_{j = 0}^k (\beta - h)\beta^j h^{k-j} = \sum_{j = 0}^k [\beta^{j+1}h^{k-j} - \beta^j h^{k-(j-1)}] = \sum_{j = 0}^k (x_{j+1} - x_j),$$

where $x_j = \beta^{j}h^{k-(j-1)}$. The sum you see at end is known as a telescoping sum. When you expand the sum, the only term that "survive" are $x_{n+1}$ and $x_0$, because all other terms cancel. So we'll have

$$\sum_{j = 0}^k (x_{j+1} - x_j) = x_{k+1} - x_0 = \beta^{k+1} - h^{k+1}.$$

Finally, since $\beta \neq h$ (so $\beta - h \neq 0$), we conclude

$$\sum_{j = 0}^k \beta^k h^{j-k} = \frac{\beta^{k+1} - h^{k+1}}{\beta - h}.$$
 
  • #6
Manfred1999 said:
The one where beta goes to infinity!

What do you mean by this?
 
  • #7
Dear Euge,

Thank you very much for your very detailed answer. I eventually could answer the question myself. However, your explanations were still really useful. Much appreciated.

Manfred
Euge said:
The expressions $j^{k-j}$ should be $h^{k-j}$. To prove the corrected formula, perform synthetic division. Alternatively, multiply the sum $\sum\limits_{j = 0}^n \beta^j h^{k-j}$ by $\beta - h$; this gives

$$(\beta - h)\sum_{j = 0}^k \beta^j h^{k-j} = \sum_{j = 0}^k (\beta - h)\beta^j h^{k-j} = \sum_{j = 0}^k [\beta^{j+1}h^{k-j} - \beta^j h^{k-(j-1)}] = \sum_{j = 0}^k (x_{j+1} - x_j),$$

where $x_j = \beta^{j}h^{k-(j-1)}$. The sum you see at end is known as a telescoping sum. When you expand the sum, the only term that "survive" are $x_{n+1}$ and $x_0$, because all other terms cancel. So we'll have

$$\sum_{j = 0}^k (x_{j+1} - x_j) = x_{k+1} - x_0 = \beta^{k+1} - h^{k+1}.$$

Finally, since $\beta \neq h$ (so $\beta - h \neq 0$), we conclude

$$\sum_{j = 0}^k \beta^k h^{j-k} = \frac{\beta^{k+1} - h^{k+1}}{\beta - h}.$$
 

FAQ: Convergence of a geometric series

What is the formula for finding the sum of a geometric series?

The formula for finding the sum of a geometric series is S = a1 / (1-r), where a1 is the first term of the series and r is the common ratio.

How do you determine if a geometric series converges or diverges?

A geometric series will converge if the absolute value of the common ratio r is less than 1. Otherwise, it will diverge.

What is the difference between a convergent and divergent geometric series?

A convergent geometric series has a finite sum, meaning that the terms of the series approach a specific value as the number of terms increases. On the other hand, a divergent geometric series has an infinite sum, meaning that the terms of the series do not approach a specific value as the number of terms increases.

What is a common application of a geometric series?

A common application of a geometric series is in compound interest calculations, where the principle amount increases by a constant ratio over time.

Can a geometric series have a negative common ratio?

Yes, a geometric series can have a negative common ratio. However, in order for the series to converge, the absolute value of the common ratio must be less than 1.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
484
Back
Top