Convergence of a particular infinite sum

In summary: So, in summary, given a bounded sequence of nonnegative numbers b_n and a number r such that 0 \leq r < 1, the sequence s_n = b_1*r + b_2*r^2 + ... + b_n*r^n is bounded and monotonically increasing, thus it converges.
  • #1
krissycokl
8
0

Homework Statement


Let [itex]b_n[/itex] be a bounded sequence of nonnegative numbers. Let r be a number such that [itex]0 \leq r < 1[/itex].
Define [itex]s_n = b_1*r + b_2*r^2 + ... + b_n*r^n[/itex], for all natural numbers n.
Prove that [itex]{s_n}[/itex] converges.


Homework Equations


Sum of first n terms of geometric series = [itex]sum_n = (a_1)(1-r^{n+1})/(1-r)[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


Clearly, [itex]{s_n}[/itex] is monotonically increasing.
Since [itex]{b_n}[/itex] is bounded, [itex]|b_n| \leq M[/itex], for all natural numbers n.

I want to use the fact that if [itex]{s_n}[/itex] is both monotonically increasing and is bounded, then it must converge. The part of the problem that has stumped me for the past 45 minutes is how to show that [itex]{s_n}[/itex] is bounded.

The only material we've covered regarding infinite series thus far is for purely geometric series, which doesn't fit this problem precisely--but I included the formula anyway.

Help would be greatly appreciated! I have an exam on Monday and getting so completely stymied by a simple problem is not doing wonders for my confidence.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sn=b1*r+b2*r^2+...bn*r^n<=M*r+M*r^2+...+M*r^n, right? That's just a hint. Does it help?
 
  • #3
Aghhhh, so simple! Something about the way I do proofs is just <i>wrong</i>, I always get caught in roadblocks of thinking and miss simple detours like that.

[itex]s_n \leq M*r + M*r^2 + ... + M*r^n[/itex]
Then [itex]s_n \leq M(r-r^{n+1})/(1-r)[/itex]
Then [itex]s_n \leq Mr/(1-r) = M'[/itex]
Then [itex]|s_n| \leq M'[/itex] for all natural numbers n, so [itex]s_n[/itex] is bounded.
Thus, since [itex]s_n[/itex] is bounded and monotonically increasing, we have [itex]s_n[/itex] converges.

Or, I think that's right, anyway.

Thanks a bunch!
 
  • #4
krissycokl said:
Aghhhh, so simple! Something about the way I do proofs is just <i>wrong</i>, I always get caught in roadblocks of thinking and miss simple detours like that.

[itex]s_n \leq M*r + M*r^2 + ... + M*r^n[/itex]
Then [itex]s_n \leq M(r-r^{n+1})/(1-r)[/itex]
Then [itex]s_n \leq Mr/(1-r) = M'[/itex]
Then [itex]|s_n| \leq M'[/itex] for all natural numbers n, so [itex]s_n[/itex] is bounded.
Thus, since [itex]s_n[/itex] is bounded and monotonically increasing, we have [itex]s_n[/itex] converges.

Or, I think that's right, anyway.

Thanks a bunch!

It's exactly right. Good take on the hint.
 

FAQ: Convergence of a particular infinite sum

What is the definition of convergence of an infinite sum?

The convergence of an infinite sum refers to the property of an infinite series where the sum of its terms approaches a finite value as the number of terms increases. This means that the sum of the series will eventually stabilize and not continue to increase indefinitely.

How do you determine if an infinite sum converges?

There are several tests that can be used to determine the convergence of an infinite sum, such as the ratio test, the comparison test, and the integral test. These tests involve analyzing the behavior of the terms in the series and comparing them to known convergent or divergent series.

What is the difference between absolute and conditional convergence?

Absolute convergence refers to the convergence of an infinite sum where the values of the terms are always positive, while conditional convergence refers to convergence where the terms alternate between positive and negative values. In general, absolute convergence is stronger and implies conditional convergence, but not vice versa.

Can an infinite sum converge to a value other than zero?

Yes, an infinite sum can converge to any finite value, including zero. However, if an infinite sum converges to a non-zero value, it is called a convergent series, while a series that converges to zero is called a null series.

How does the convergence of an infinite sum relate to the convergence of its individual terms?

The convergence of an infinite sum is closely related to the behavior of its individual terms. If the terms of a series do not approach zero, then the series will not converge. However, even if the terms do approach zero, it does not necessarily guarantee convergence, as the series may still diverge due to other factors such as the rate of decrease of the terms.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
845
Replies
4
Views
515
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top