Converting a Cartesian Integral to a Polar Integral

In summary, the graph of x=√4-y^2 is a semicircle with a radius of 2, encompassing the right half of the xy plane and intersecting with the graph of x=y, which is a straight line with a slope of 1. The intersection point is (√2,√2). The integral for this region is ∫∫ r dr dΘ with r ranging from 2cscΘ to 2 and Θ ranging from π/4 to π/2. The upper limit for r is determined by the circle x^2 + y^2 = 4, while the lower limit is determined by the line y=√2. This is calculated
  • #1
Amadeo
28
9
Homework Statement
Convert the following double integral to polar coordinated and evaluate:
Relevant Equations
x=rcosΘ
y=rsinΘ
Q16.PNG


the graph of x= √4-y^2 is a semicircle or radius 2 encompassing the right half of the xy plane (containing points (0,2); (2,0); (0-2))
the graph of x=y is a straight line of slope 1

The intersection of these two graphs is (√2,√2)

y ranges from √2 to 2. Therefore, the area over which we integrate is between the line y=√2; y=2; and x=√4-y^2 as in the shaded region in this picture:

IMG_1154.JPG


This means that the new integral, in polar form is:

∫∫ r dr dΘ with r ranging from √2cscΘ to 2 and Θ ranging from π/4 to π/2
However, the solution is

∫∫ r dr dΘ with r ranging from 2cscΘ to 2 and Θ ranging from π/4 to π/2

I do not understand why this is the case. If y=√2, then rsinΘ = √2 => r=(√2)cscΘ. this would then be the lower limit, as r extends out to the upper limit of 2. Thank you for your assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
From your drawing, it looks to me as though you are letting ##x## vary between ##0## and ##\sqrt {4-y^2}##.
 
  • #3
:doh: Oh gosh, how embarrassing. Thank you.
 
  • #4
The first thing I notice is that [tex](\sqrt{2},\sqrt{2})[/tex] lies on the line [tex]\theta= \frac{\pi}{4}[/tex] and that [tex](0, 2)[/tex] lies on the line [tex]\theta= \frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]. So the "[tex]\theta[/tex]" integral is from [tex]\frac{\pi}{4}[/tex] to [tex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]. Now, for each [tex]\theta[/tex], r is measured on the line through the origin making angle [tex]\theta[/tex] with the x-axis so with slope [tex]tan(\theta)[/tex]: [tex]y= tan(\theta)x[/tex]. That line crosses [tex]y= \sqrt{2}[/tex] where [tex]x= \frac{\sqrt{2}}{tan(\theta)}[/tex]. r is the distance from the origin to that point: [tex]r= \sqrt{2+ 2 tan^2(\theta)}= \sqrt{2}\sqrt{1+ tan^2(\theta)}= sec(\theta)[/tex]. That line crosses the circle [tex]x^2+ y^2= 4[/tex] where [tex]x^2+ tan^2(\theta)x^2= sec^2(\theta)x^2= 4[/tex] or [tex]x= 2 cos(\theta)[/tex], [tex]y= 2 cos(\theta)tan(\theta)= 2 sin(\theta).

The integral is [tex] \int_{\pi/4}^{\pi/2} \int_{sec(\theta)}^{2 sin(\theta)} r dr d\theta[/tex].
 

FAQ: Converting a Cartesian Integral to a Polar Integral

What is the process for converting a Cartesian integral to a Polar integral?

To convert a Cartesian integral to a Polar integral, you must first change the limits of integration from rectangular coordinates to polar coordinates. Then, you must substitute the polar coordinate expressions for x and y into the integrand. Finally, you must also change the differential element from dxdy to r drdθ.

What are the advantages of converting a Cartesian integral to a Polar integral?

Converting a Cartesian integral to a Polar integral can make the integral easier to evaluate, especially when the integrand contains trigonometric functions. It can also allow for a more natural interpretation of the integral in terms of polar coordinates.

Can any Cartesian integral be converted to a Polar integral?

No, not all Cartesian integrals can be converted to Polar integrals. The integrand must be able to be expressed in terms of polar coordinates and the limits of integration must be in the appropriate range for polar coordinates.

What is the relationship between the Cartesian and Polar coordinate systems?

The Cartesian and Polar coordinate systems are two different ways of representing points in a two-dimensional plane. In the Cartesian system, points are represented by their x and y coordinates, while in the Polar system, points are represented by their distance from the origin (r) and the angle they make with the positive x-axis (θ).

Are there any other methods for converting integrals?

Yes, there are other methods for converting integrals, such as using trigonometric identities or making a change of variables. However, converting from Cartesian to Polar coordinates is a commonly used method, particularly for integrals involving circular or symmetric regions.

Similar threads

Back
Top