MHB Converting Salt Concentration to Algebraic Symbols

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symbols
AI Thread Summary
To express the amount of salt in a tank holding x quarts of water with a concentration of 21 pounds per gallon, first convert the concentration to quarts, resulting in 21/4 pounds of salt per quart. This means that the total amount of salt, S, can be represented as S = (21/4)x. However, there is confusion regarding a book answer stating the amount is x/2 pounds, which may stem from a miscommunication about the concentration value. Clarification is needed on whether the original concentration was indeed 21 pounds or a different value, as 21 pounds per gallon is unusually high. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate unit representation in mathematical expressions.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
express in algebraic symbols

The amount of salt in a tank holding x quarts of water if the concentration is 21lb of salt per gallon.

please help! thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One of the things we do is let letters stand for the quantities we wish to represent. In this case, $S$ is a natural letter to use for: "salt per one quart".

Now we are actually GIVEN: "salt (in pounds) per gallon". So the first thing to do is convert gallons to quarts.

As there are 4 quarts to a gallon, this means the ratio of salt (in pounds) to quarts is:

$\dfrac{21 \text{ pounds}}{4 \text{ quarts}}$,

that is: $\dfrac{21}{4}$ pounds per quart. So:

$S = \dfrac{21}{4}$.

Now, if we multiply that by $x$ quarts, we get...?
 


$\frac{21}{4}x$?

but the answer in my book is $\frac{x}{2}$lb salt. why is that?
 
Perhaps you typed 21lbs, when you actually meant: 2lbs? It helps to put a space between your number, and the units, since a lower case "L" looks a lot like a "1"...
 
I don't think it is possible to dissolve 21 pounds of salt in a gallon!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top