Converting this vector into polar form

In summary, the paper discusses the surface velocity of a moving, spherical particle, which is given by a summation of Legendre polynomials. They then provide an expression for the surface tangential velocity as a function of theta, which can be derived by converting the first vector into polar coordinates and taking the sum.
  • #1
Rodger125
3
0
TL;DR Summary
I'd like to convert this surface velocity vector into the form I described. It might be just a matter of converting it into polar coords
In the following paper, the surface velocity for a moving, spherical particle is given as (eq 1):

$$\textbf{v}_s(\hat{\textbf{r}}) = \sum {2\over{{n(n+1)}}} B_n (\hat{\textbf{e}} \cdot \hat{\textbf{r}} \hat{\textbf{r}} - \hat{\textbf{e}}) P_n'( \hat{\textbf{e}} \cdot \hat{\textbf{r}})$$

where ##\hat{\textbf{r}}## is the preferred swimming axis (we consider that the sphere carries with it a fixed coordinate system that determines its preferred moving direction at each instant). ##\hat{\textbf{r}}## is a unit vector from the particle center to a point on the surface, we have the Legendre polynomials with $$P_n'$$ being the derivative of the n-th order Legendre polynomial, and $$B_n$$ is the amplitude of the corresponding mode.

They then (up to N=2) write the following expression for the surface tangential velocity, as a function of theta
$$\textbf{v}_s(\theta) = B_1 [sin(\theta) + {\alpha\over{2}} sin(2\theta)] \hat{\theta}$$
where $$\beta = B_2 / B_1$$.

How does one arrive at the second equation? Do you convert the first vector into polar coordinates? If so, how do you do this?

Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I do not go into the mathematics but I am convinced that velocity of fluid at particle surface has no radial component. In fact
[tex] \mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \textbf{v}_s(\hat{\textbf{r}}) = \sum {2\over{{n(n+1)}}} B_n (\mathbf{\hat{r}}\cdot (\hat{\textbf{e}}\cdot \hat{\textbf{r}}) \hat{\textbf{r}} - \mathbf{\hat{r}}\cdot\hat{\textbf{e}}) P_n'( \hat{\textbf{e}} \cdot \hat{\textbf{r}}) =0 [/tex]
where
[tex]\mathbf{\hat{r}}\cdot \mathbf{\hat{r}}=1[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Rodger125
  • #3
anuttarasammyak said:
I do not go into the mathematics but I am convinced that velocity of fluid at particle surface has no radial component. In fact
[tex] \mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \textbf{v}_s(\hat{\textbf{r}}) = \sum {2\over{{n(n+1)}}} B_n (\mathbf{\hat{r}}\cdot (\hat{\textbf{e}}\cdot \hat{\textbf{r}}) \hat{\textbf{r}} - \mathbf{\hat{r}}\cdot\hat{\textbf{e}}) P_n'( \hat{\textbf{e}} \cdot \hat{\textbf{r}}) =0 [/tex]
where
[tex]\mathbf{\hat{r}}\cdot \mathbf{\hat{r}}=1[/tex]
That would make sense, I think. If we have a coordinate system moving with the sphere, and the sphere does not change in radius, surely the radial velocity would be zero
 
  • #4
Rodger125 said:
How does one arrive at the second equation? Do you convert the first vector into polar coordinates? If so, how do you do this?
The authors describe the polar angle as
$$
\hat r \cdot \hat e = \cos(\theta)
$$
Therefore taking the sum,
$$
\mathbf u^s (\hat r)=B_1(\cos(\theta)\hat r - \hat e)P_1^{'}(\cos(\theta))
$$
$$
+ \frac{1}{3} B_2(\cos(\theta)\hat r - \hat e)P_1^{'}(\cos(\theta))
$$
with
$$
P_1^{'}(\cos(\theta))=-\sin(\theta)
$$
$$
P_2^{'}(\cos(\theta))=-\frac{3}{2}\sin(2\theta)
$$
The sum becomes,
$$
-B_1(\cos(\theta)\hat r -\hat e)\sin(\theta) - \frac{1}{2} B_2(\cos(\theta)\hat r -\hat e)\sin(2\theta)
$$
The result follows if
$$
\cos(\theta)\hat r -\hat e=-\hat \theta
$$
 
  • Like
Likes Rodger125
  • #5
Fred Wright said:
The authors describe the polar angle as
$$
\hat r \cdot \hat e = \cos(\theta)
$$
Therefore taking the sum,
$$
\mathbf u^s (\hat r)=B_1(\cos(\theta)\hat r - \hat e)P_1^{'}(\cos(\theta))
$$
$$
+ \frac{1}{3} B_2(\cos(\theta)\hat r - \hat e)P_1^{'}(\cos(\theta))
$$
with
$$
P_1^{'}(\cos(\theta))=-\sin(\theta)
$$
$$
P_2^{'}(\cos(\theta))=-\frac{3}{2}\sin(2\theta)
$$
The sum becomes,
$$
-B_1(\cos(\theta)\hat r -\hat e)\sin(\theta) - \frac{1}{2} B_2(\cos(\theta)\hat r -\hat e)\sin(2\theta)
$$
The result follows if
$$
\cos(\theta)\hat r -\hat e=-\hat \theta
$$
Thank you!
 

FAQ: Converting this vector into polar form

What is polar form of a vector?

Polar form of a vector represents the vector in terms of its magnitude and direction, typically expressed as (r, θ), where r is the length of the vector (magnitude) and θ is the angle it makes with a reference direction, usually the positive x-axis.

How do I find the magnitude of a vector?

The magnitude of a vector with components (x, y) can be calculated using the formula r = √(x² + y²). This formula derives from the Pythagorean theorem, treating the vector as the hypotenuse of a right triangle formed by its components.

How do I determine the angle θ of the vector?

The angle θ can be found using the arctangent function: θ = arctan(y/x), where y is the vertical component and x is the horizontal component of the vector. It is important to consider the signs of x and y to determine the correct quadrant for θ.

What if my vector has negative components?

If the vector has negative components, the angle θ calculated using arctan(y/x) may need to be adjusted. For example, if x is negative and y is positive, add 180 degrees (or π radians) to θ to place it in the correct quadrant. Always ensure the angle is in the range of 0 to 360 degrees (or 0 to 2π radians).

Can I convert a vector in three dimensions to polar form?

Yes, vectors in three dimensions can be converted to a form similar to polar coordinates, often referred to as spherical coordinates. In this case, the vector is expressed in terms of its radial distance (r), polar angle (θ), and azimuthal angle (φ). The conversion involves more complex formulas, but the basic principles of magnitude and angles remain the same.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
854
Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
868
Back
Top