Coord Transf. in Linearized GR: Understanding Metric Transformation

In summary: This is a bit of a backwards argument. The definition of the Lie derivative is that given in #2. Based on that definition, you can derive ##(\mathcal L_\xi T)_{ab} = T_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + T_{cb} \xi^c_{,a} + \xi^c T_{ab,c}## for an arbitrary type (0,2) tensor field ##T##. Now, if you have the Levi-Civita connection, then ##\nabla_\xi g = 0## and you would have$$(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \
  • #1
Woolyabyss
143
1
I was studying linearized GR where we make the following coordinate transformation ## \tilde{x}^{a} = x^{a} + \epsilon y^{a}(x) ##

This coordinate transformation is then meant to imply ## g_{ab}(x) = \tilde{g}_{ab}(x) + \epsilon \mathcal{L}_{Y} g_{ab} ##

Would anyone be kind enough to explain to me how the metric transformation is gotten from the coordinate transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
To some extent, this is how the Lie derivative of the metric is defined. The Lie derivative is given by
$$
\mathcal L_Y g = \lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left[\frac{1}{\epsilon}(\gamma_{Y}(\epsilon)^* g - g)\right],
$$
where ##\gamma_Y(\epsilon)## is the flow of the vector field ##Y## for a parameter distance ##\epsilon##. If you write this out in coordinates, you will get exactly your given relation.

(Note that ##f^*g## is the pullback of ##g## under the diffeomorphism ##f##.)
 
  • #3
Noticing that the Lie Derivative for the metric is ##(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}##
you can write down the metric in ##x+ \epsilon \xi## $$g_{ab} (x+ \epsilon \xi) d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^a d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^b = (g_{ab} + \epsilon (g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}))dx^a dx^b + \mathcal O (\epsilon^2) \approx (g_{ab} + \epsilon (\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab}) dx^a dx^b$$
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Woolyabyss
  • #4
kent davidge said:
Noticing that the Lie Derivative for the metric is ##(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}##
you can write down the metric in ##x+ \epsilon \xi## $$g_{ab} (x+ \epsilon \xi) d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^a d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^b = (g_{ab} + \epsilon (g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}))dx^a dx^b + \mathcal O (\epsilon^2) \approx (g_{ab} + \epsilon (\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab}) dx^a dx^b$$
This is a bit of a backwards argument. The definition of the Lie derivative is that given in #2. Based on that definition, you can derive ##(\mathcal L_\xi T)_{ab} = T_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + T_{cb} \xi^c_{,a} + \xi^c T_{ab,c}## for an arbitrary type (0,2) tensor field ##T##. Now, if you have the Levi-Civita connection, then ##\nabla_\xi g = 0## and you would have
$$
(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{;b} + g_{cb} \xi^c_{;a}.
$$
Note that you get some Christoffel symbols out of ##\xi^c g_{ab,c}## that turn the derivatives of the ##\xi## into covariant derivatives. Thus, you get the expression you started with from applying the definition of the Lie derivative, not the other way around.
 
  • Like
Likes Woolyabyss
  • #5
Much appreciated guys. I understand now thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
  • #6
Woolyabyss said:
I was studying linearized GR where we make the following coordinate transformation ## \tilde{x}^{a} = x^{a} + \epsilon y^{a}(x) ##

This coordinate transformation is then meant to imply ## g_{ab}(x) = \tilde{g}_{ab}(x) + \epsilon \mathcal{L}_{Y} g_{ab} ##

Would anyone be kind enough to explain to me how the metric transformation is gotten from the coordinate transformation?
Just substitute [itex]\bar{x} = x + \epsilon Y[/itex] in the transformation law of the metric tensor and expand to first order in [itex]\epsilon[/itex]. It is more convenient to work with the inverted transformation [tex]g_{ab}(x) = \frac{\partial \bar{x}^{c}}{\partial x^{a}}\frac{\partial \bar{x}^{d}}{\partial x^{b}} \bar{g}_{cd}(\bar{x}) .[/tex] Keep in mind that infinitesimal transformation means that [itex]\bar{g}_{ab} = g_{ab} + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon)[/itex]. Therefore, to first order in [itex]\epsilon[/itex], you can use [itex]\epsilon \ \bar{g}_{ab}(x) = \epsilon \ g_{ab}(x)[/itex] when you Tylor-expand [itex]\bar{g}_{cd} (\bar{x})[/itex] and when you multiply [itex]\bar{g}_{cd}(x)[/itex] by other [itex]\epsilon[/itex]-terms:
[tex]g_{ab}(x) = \left( \delta^{c}_{a} + \epsilon \ \partial_{a}Y^{c}\right) \left( \delta^{d}_{b} + \epsilon \ \partial_{b}Y^{d} \right) \left( \bar{g}_{cd}(x) + \epsilon \ Y^{e}\partial_{e} g_{cd}(x) \right) .[/tex] So, to first order, you can rewrite this as [tex]- \frac{1}{\epsilon} \left( \bar{g}_{ab} - g_{ab}\right) (x) \equiv - \left( \mathcal{L}_{Y}g\right)_{ab} (x) = Y^{c}\partial_{c}g_{ab} + g_{ac}\partial_{b}Y^{c} + g_{cb}\partial_{a}Y^{c} .[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes Woolyabyss

FAQ: Coord Transf. in Linearized GR: Understanding Metric Transformation

What is a coordinate transformation in linearized general relativity?

A coordinate transformation in linearized general relativity is a mathematical tool used to describe the relationship between different coordinate systems in spacetime. It allows for the conversion of coordinates between different frames of reference, which is necessary for understanding the effects of gravity on the curvature of spacetime.

Why is understanding metric transformation important in linearized general relativity?

Metric transformation is important in linearized general relativity because it allows for the calculation of physical quantities, such as distances and time intervals, in different frames of reference. This is crucial for accurately describing the effects of gravity on the curvature of spacetime and making predictions about the behavior of objects in the universe.

How does metric transformation differ from coordinate transformation?

Metric transformation and coordinate transformation are closely related but distinct concepts. While coordinate transformation deals with the conversion of coordinates between different frames of reference, metric transformation involves the transformation of the metric tensor, which describes the curvature of spacetime. In other words, metric transformation is a more fundamental concept that underlies coordinate transformation.

What is the role of linearization in metric transformation?

Linearization is a mathematical technique used to simplify complex equations and make them easier to solve. In the context of metric transformation in linearized general relativity, linearization allows for the approximation of the metric tensor in weak gravitational fields, making it easier to calculate the effects of gravity on spacetime.

How does understanding metric transformation contribute to our understanding of the universe?

Understanding metric transformation is crucial for accurately describing the effects of gravity on the curvature of spacetime, which is essential for understanding the behavior of objects in the universe. It allows us to make predictions about the motion of planets, stars, and galaxies, as well as the behavior of light and other forms of energy in the presence of strong gravitational fields.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
73
Views
10K
Back
Top