Coriolis Force in East-West Direction

In summary, the Coriolis force applies to objects traveling east or west because the Earth's surface has a changing velocity with latitude, causing a drift east or west relative to the surface. This effect is due to the Earth's rotation and can be observed in objects floating in large bodies of water, which tend to move in clockwise circles relative to the Earth's surface. The magnitude and direction of this force are independent of the direction of the object's velocity.
  • #1
person123
328
52
TL;DR Summary
Why does the Coriolis Force apply on objects travelling east or west?
For objects traveling north or south, the Coriolis force makes sense. The velocity of the Earth's surface changes with latitude, causing an object to drift east or west relative to the Earth's surface.

However, when an object is traveling east or west, the latitude is not changing. How would the Coriolis force still apply?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
person123 said:
Summary:: Why does the Coriolis Force apply on objects traveling east or west?

For objects traveling north or south, the Coriolis force makes sense. The velocity of the Earth's surface changes with latitude, causing an object to drift east or west relative to the Earth's surface.

However, when an object is traveling east or west, the latitude is not changing. How would the Coriolis force still apply?
The Coriolis force is more complicated than you imagine. The term is ##-2m(\vec \omega \times \vec v)##, where ##\vec v## is the velocity relative to the rotating reference frame and ##\vec \omega## is the angular velocity - this will be in the north-south direction for the Earth. Note that this means that for an object moving north or south at the equator, the Coriolis force will be zero, but not for an object moving east or west.

See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #3
PeroK said:
##\omega## is the velocity relative to the rotating reference frame
According to the wikipedia article:

"
{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\omega }}}
is the angular velocity, of the rotating reference frame relative to the inertial frame"

which I think is quite different.

It's hard for me to follow the rest of your post because I'm not sure what was meant by ##\omega##.
 
  • #4
At any given point the Coriolus force is perpendicular to the direction of movement. In the northern hemisphere the Coriolus force causes a turn to the right. Free floating buoys tend to move in clockwise circles. This is because the surface of the Earth is moving to the left.

The force is zero at the equator.
 
  • #5
person123 said:
According to the wikipedia article:

"
{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\omega }}}
is the angular velocity, of the rotating reference frame relative to the inertial frame"

which I think is quite different.

It's hard for me to follow the rest of your post because I'm not sure what was meant by ##\omega##.
It was a typo. ##\vec v## is the velocity, of course.
 
  • Like
Likes person123
  • #6
Hornbein said:
At any given point the Coriolus force is perpendicular to the direction of movement. In the northern hemisphere the Coriolus force causes a turn to the right. Free floating buoys tend to move in clockwise circles. This is because the surface of the Earth is moving to the left.

The force is zero at the equator.
This is wrong. See the wikipedia page - or, any other reference on the Coriolis force.
 
  • #7
When you travel E-W, your velocity is increasing or decreasing the tangential velocity of your body above or below the tangential velocity of the earth. This results in a change in the centripetal acceleration on you in the N-S direction. This effect only occurs away from the equator. Imagine yourself on a merry-go-round, and you start walking in the same direction as the rotation or in the opposite direction.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
person123 said:
However, when an object is traveling east or west, the latitude is not changing. How would the Coriolis force still apply?
Edit: although the following is true, it is not relevant to the Coriolis force: my apologies for any confusion: Lines of latitude are curved on the surface of the Earth. An object traveling in a straight line is following a great circle route which (apart from at the equator) is not of constant latitude.

Note also the vertical component of the Coriolis force often referred to as the Eötvös effect.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
pbuk said:
Lines of latitude are curved on the surface of the Earth. An object traveling in a straight line is following a great circle route which (apart from at the equator) is not of constant latitude.

Note also the vertical component of the Coriolis force often referred to as the Eötvös effect.
A great circle is not a straight line.
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
A great circle is not a straight line.
On the surface of a sphere it is. If the sphere were stationary it is the path that a moving object will follow that it not accelerating in the reference frame of the surface (or has no component of acceleration perpendicular to its velocity). In the Northern hemisphere of the Earth, the path of such an object drifts to the right with acceleration ## (2 \omega \sin \varphi) v ## perpendicular to its velocity relative to the sphere. The magnitude and direction (relative to velocity) of this force are independent of the direction of the object's velocity.

Edit: note that ## \omega \approx 7.27×10−5 s^{−1} ## so in a stream of 1 m/s (approximately 2 knots which is quite fast but it makes the arithmetic easy) at 30 degrees north (i.e. ## \sin \varphi = 0.5 ##) we have a Coriolis acceleration of ## 2 (7.27×10−5) (0.5) \approx 7.27×10−5 ms^{-2} ## or about Edit: 0.25 m/s per hour. knots per hour (and yes I do mean knots per hour = nautical miles per hour per hour).
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Hornbein said:
Free floating buoys tend to move in clockwise circles. This is because the surface of the Earth is moving to the left.
PeroK said:
This is wrong.
Not entirely wrong, just incomplete. Completing it:

In the Northern hemisphere objects floating in large bodies of open water tend to move in clockwise circles ellipses relative to the solid surface of the Earth. This is because the surface of the Earth is moving to the left whilst the object drifts with the tidal stream.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
pbuk said:
In the Northern hemisphere objects floating in large bodies of open water tend to move in clockwise circles relative to the solid surface of the Earth. This is because the surface of the Earth is moving to the left whilst the object drifts with the tidal stream.
This Coriolis force is related to the angular velocity in a rotating reference frame. It's not about "motion to the right or left", or caused by ocean tides.
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
This Coriolis force is related to the angular velocity in a rotating reference frame. It's not about "motion to the right or left", or caused by ocean tides.
I think we must be at cross-purposes: the Coriolis force is given by ## − 2 m (\boldsymbol \omega \times \boldsymbol v) ## where ## \boldsymbol v ## is the velocity in the rotating reference frame. The "motion to the right or left" or tide is that ## \boldsymbol v ##.
 
  • #14
pbuk said:
On the surface of a sphere it is. If the sphere were stationary it is the path that a moving object will follow that it not accelerating in the reference frame of the surface (or has no component of acceleration perpendicular to its velocity). In the Northern hemisphere of the Earth, the path of such an object drifts to the right with acceleration ## (2 \omega \sin \varphi) v ## perpendicular to its velocity relative to the sphere. The magnitude and direction (relative to velocity) of this force are independent of the direction of the object's velocity.

Edit: note that ## \omega \approx 7.27×10−5 s^{−1} ## so in a stream of 1 m/s (approximately 2 knots which is quite fast but it makes the arithmetic easy) at 30 degrees north (i.e. ## \sin \varphi = 0.5 ##) we have a Coriolis acceleration of ## 2 (7.27×10−5) (0.5) \approx 7.27×10−5 ms^{-2} ## or about 0.25 m/s per hour.
The surface of a sphere is a curved subspace in 3D space, and a great circle is definitely curved in 3D space.

Do you realize how irresponsible it is to bring this concept up to a student at the apparent level of the OP?
 
  • #15
When an object travels on a circle, the centrifugal force is mv2/r, which equals mωr, because ω=v/r.
Now, on rotating Earth, the centrifugal force is always present... but it causes and is balanced by the bulge of Earth equatorial flattening, showing in a decrease of gravity at equator.

ΔBut when an object moves east-west anywhere east and west exist (anywhere away from poles) then the direction of the movement matters. Because the total velocity is now (v+Δv) where v is the rotation speed of ground beneath and Δv the speed relative to ground.
Total centrifugal force then becomes m(v+Δv)2/r=m(v2+2vΔv+Δ2v)/r
The component mv2/r is the part already included in ambient gravity and curvature of the horizontal. The part mΔ2v/r is the small centrifugal force due to moving on round though big earth. But the part m*2vΔv/r is the Coriolis force.
At equator, Coriolis force is directly vertical - but it is actually there.
 
  • Like
Likes person123
  • #16
snorkack said:
At equator, Coriolis force is directly vertical - but it is actually there.
The vertical force is called the Eotvos force.
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman
  • #17
snorkack said:
When an object travels on a circle, the centrifugal force is mv2/r, which equals mωr, because ω=v/r.
Now, on rotating Earth, the centrifugal force is always present... but it causes and is balanced by the bulge of Earth equatorial flattening, showing in a decrease of gravity at equator.

ΔBut when an object moves east-west anywhere east and west exist (anywhere away from poles) then the direction of the movement matters. Because the total velocity is now (v+Δv) where v is the rotation speed of ground beneath and Δv the speed relative to ground.
Total centrifugal force then becomes m(v+Δv)2/r=m(v2+2vΔv+Δ2v)/r
The component mv2/r is the part already included in ambient gravity and curvature of the horizontal. The part mΔ2v/r is the small centrifugal force due to moving on round though big earth. But the part m*2vΔv/r is the Coriolis force.
At equator, Coriolis force is directly vertical - but it is actually there.
Thank you, that clarifies it a lot for me. I missed that there would be a cross term when adding the velocities from Earth's rotation and an object's motion.
 
  • #18
Hornbein said:
The vertical force is called the Eotvos force.
Eötvös force is just a component of the Coriolis force as defined in physics. It's only in Earth science, that Coriolis force sometimes refers to the components tangential to the Earth's surface, while the normal component has a special name.
 
  • #19
person123 said:
Thank you, that clarifies it a lot for me. I missed that there would be a cross term when adding the velocities from Earth's rotation and an object's motion.
One example to see why you need the radial Coriolis component for tangential motion: An object that at rest in an inertial frame is moving in circles when seen from a rotating frame (when it has some constant offset to the frame axis). To account for the circular motion in the rotating frame you need a net centripetal force, towards the frame axis. This cannot be the centrifugal force, which points always away from the axis. In this case the Coriolis force must cancel the centrifugal force and provide the centripetal acceleration, hence the factor 2, in the Coriolis formula.
 
  • #20
East-West makes sense only in the context of Earth science, so presumably this is what the original poster had in mind.
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk
  • #21
Hornbein said:
East-West makes sense only in the context of Earth science, so presumably this is what the original poster had in mind.
I don't think the decomposition of the Coriolis force based on the Earth surface (like done in Earth science) is relevant to the OP's question. The question can be answered using the basic definition of the Coriolis force in a rotating reference frame, which is independent of any specific surface. East-West translates to tangential movement with or against the reference frame rotation.
 
  • Like
Likes person123 and PeroK
  • #22
A.T. said:
I don't think the decomposition of the Coriolis force based on the Earth surface (like done in Earth science) is relevant to the OP's question.
I do. Look at the highlighted words in the OP:
person123 said:
Summary:: Why does the Coriolis Force apply on objects traveling east or west?

For objects traveling north or south, the Coriolis force makes sense. The velocity of the earth's surface changes with latitude, causing an object to drift east or west relative to the Earth's surface.

However, when an object is traveling east or west, the latitude is not changing. How would the Coriolis force still apply?
All of those words refer to the 2D spherical geometry of the Earth's surface so I cannot understand how an answer in Euclidian 3-space is relevant.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
  • #23
A.T. said:
I don't think the decomposition of the Coriolis force based on the Earth surface (like done in Earth science) is relevant to the OP's question. The question can be answered using the basic definition of the Coriolis force in a rotating reference frame, which is independent of any specific surface. East-West translates to tangential movement with or against the reference frame rotation.
Chestermiller said:
The surface of a sphere is a curved subspace in 3D space, and a great circle is definitely curved in 3D space.

Do you realize how irresponsible it is to bring this concept up to a student at the apparent level of the OP?
Both these comments assume that the coordinates of a 3D rotating reference frame are more 'basic' to everyone than rotating spherical coordinates, however for anyone who has navigated an aircraft or a ship on a long passage the opposite is true. If, as in this case, the OP indicates that they are familiar with spherical geometry then with respect to @Chestermiller I think it is irresponsible to insist with apparent authority that a great circle is not a straight line in that geometry.

I started a thread in the SA forum to address this apparent confusion among us.
 
  • #24
david316 said:
I don't think the decomposition of the Coriolis force based on the Earth surface (like done in Earth science) is relevant to the OP's question.
pbuk said:
I do. Look at the highlighted words in the OP:
Just because the OP framed the question in terms of the Earth surface, doesn't mean the Earth surface is actually relevant to understanding the core issue the OP is having, which is much more basic and general.

pbuk said:
I cannot understand how an answer in Euclidian 3-space is relevant.
You don't need much 3D, because the Coriolis force always lies in the plane perpendicular to the frame rotation axis. So you are just dealing with a simple plane instead of a sphere. Once you fully understand the Coriolis force in that plane, including for tangential motion, you can then still decompose it based on the local normal of some sphere.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #25
person123 said:
Why does the Coriolis Force apply on objects traveling east or west?
Recall the formula: ##\mathbf{F} = -2m \boldsymbol{\Omega} \times \mathbf{v}##. Here the angular velocity ##\boldsymbol{\Omega}## is aligned with the axis of the Earth.

For motion on the Earth's surface, i.e. for ##\mathbf{v}## parallel to the Earth's surface, one usually recasts this in the form* ##f = 2m\Omega v \sin{\lambda}##, parallel to the direction ##(v_y, -v_x, 0)##, where ##\lambda## is the latitude angle. Both components of the velocity (E-W and N-S) contribute to the Coriolis force!

*derivation: let ##(x,y,z)## be local Cartesian coordinates in a small region of the Earth's surface, with ##\mathbf{e}_z## the local vertical. Put ##\mathbf{v} = (v_x, v_y, 0)##. In this basis one can also express ##\boldsymbol{\Omega} = (0, \Omega \cos{\lambda}, \Omega \sin{\lambda})##, therefore \begin{align*}
-2m\boldsymbol{\Omega} \times \mathbf{v} &= 2m\Omega (v_y \sin{\lambda}, -v_x \sin{\lambda}, v_x \cos{\lambda})
\end{align*}The projection onto the Earth's surface is ##\mathbf{f} = 2m \Omega (v_y \sin{\lambda}, -v_x \sin{\lambda}, 0)##, having a size ##f = |\mathbf{f}| = 2m \Omega v##.
 
Last edited:
  • #26
Yes with a bit of editing:
A.T. said:
the Coriolis force always lies [in] the plane perpendicular to the [axis of rotation] ... Once you fully understand the Coriolis force in that plane [you can decompose it into components tangential and normal to the surface].
this is now heading towards an explanation which I think works better for those without a background in 3D vector mechanics.
 
  • #27
pbuk said:
Yes with a bit of editing: ... this is now heading towards an explanation which I think works better for those without a background in 3D vector mechanics.

Yes, and the 3D stuff only comes in, when you try to relate it to the Earth's surface. The Coriolis force itself can be understood in the 2D plane of rotation:

 
  • Love
Likes PeroK
  • #28
ergospherical said:
having a size ##f = |\mathbf{f}| = 2m \Omega v##.[/I]
I think you mean ## f = |\mathbf{f}| = 2m \Omega v \sin \lambda ##. Also note that ## \omega ## is normally used for scalar angular velocity and ## \varphi ## for latitude, and of course we have east and north instead of x and y, hence the expression of the surface Coriolis acceleration relevant to navigators of ## 2 \omega \sin \varphi \begin{pmatrix} v_n \\ -v_e \end{pmatrix} ##.

This obviously only works with a background in vector mechanics, but put this quantitative solution together with a qualitative one and I think we have hit the target (ballistics pun intended).
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #29
A.T. said:
Yes, and the 3D stuff only comes in, when you try to relate it to the Earth's surface.
Ah, but if my starting point is the Earth's surface then this understanding:
A.T. said:
The Coriolis force itself can be understood in the 2D plane of rotation:
is no help to me: I cannot fire a cannonball into the surface of the Earth, and an object on a rotating disc cannot move north (up).
 
  • #30
pbuk said:
I think you mean ## f = |\mathbf{f}| = 2m \Omega v \sin \lambda##.
Thanks - typo!

pbuk said:
Also note that ##\omega## is normally used for scalar angular velocity and ##\varphi## for latitude.
Well, notation is the prerogative of the author. I used ##\Omega## and ##\lambda## sub-consciously because that's what my lecturer used last year.
 
  • #31
pbuk said:
Ah, but if my starting point is the Earth's surface then this understanding:

is no help to me: I cannot fire a cannonball into the surface of the Earth, and an object on a rotating disc cannot move north (up).
Then start with the Earth's surface near the North Pole. It's almost like a rotating disc.
 
  • #32
A.T. said:
I don't think the decomposition of the Coriolis force based on the Earth surface (like done in Earth science) is relevant to the OP's question. The question can be answered using the basic definition of the Coriolis force in a rotating reference frame, which is independent of any specific surface. East-West translates to tangential movement with or against the reference frame rotation.
Yes, I do actually regret framing the question specifically about the Earth since I would have the same exact confusion with respect to an object traveling tangentially on a rotating disc.

Thank you very much to everyone for all the posts; I'm still not that clear when it comes to relating the derivations with a conceptual understanding but it sort of makes sense to me.
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk, PeroK and A.T.
  • #33
person123 said:
Thank you very much to everyone for all the posts; I'm still not that clear when it comes to relating the derivations with a conceptual understanding but it sort of makes sense to me.
You're welcome. The radial Coriolis force component is a common source of confusion, because the definitions of the inertial forces in a rotating frame are based on mathematical simplicity, rather than ease of intuitive conceptualization. Here my explanation from a previous thread:
A.T. said:
One intuitive way to think about the radial Coriolis force, is as a velocity dependent modification of the centrifugal force. In fact you could order the inertial force terms in a rotating frame by direction, and lump the radial Coriolis force with radial centrifugal force. But for mathematical and historical reasons we separate them as position dependent term (centrifugal) and a velocity dependent term (Coriolis).
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Coriolis Force in East-West Direction

What is the Coriolis force in the East-West direction?

The Coriolis force in the East-West direction is a deflection force that occurs due to the rotation of the Earth. As the Earth rotates from west to east, objects moving in a straight line appear to curve to the right in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere.

How does the Coriolis force affect weather patterns in the East-West direction?

The Coriolis force plays a crucial role in shaping weather patterns in the East-West direction. In the Northern Hemisphere, winds are deflected to the right, creating high-pressure systems on the west side of continents and low-pressure systems on the east side. In the Southern Hemisphere, winds are deflected to the left, resulting in the opposite pattern.

What factors influence the strength of the Coriolis force in the East-West direction?

The strength of the Coriolis force in the East-West direction is influenced by the speed of the object, latitude, and the rotation rate of the Earth. The faster the object is moving, the stronger the Coriolis force will be. Additionally, the Coriolis force is strongest at the poles and weakest at the equator.

How does the Coriolis force impact ocean currents in the East-West direction?

The Coriolis force plays a significant role in the direction and strength of ocean currents in the East-West direction. In the Northern Hemisphere, ocean currents are deflected to the right, resulting in clockwise circulation. In the Southern Hemisphere, ocean currents are deflected to the left, causing counterclockwise circulation.

Can the Coriolis force in the East-West direction be observed in everyday life?

Yes, the Coriolis force in the East-West direction can be observed in everyday life. For example, the rotation of hurricanes and typhoons is influenced by the Coriolis force, causing them to spin in a counterclockwise direction in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere. Additionally, the Coriolis force can affect the trajectory of objects, such as projectiles or airplanes, in the East-West direction.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top