Correct Angle for FSW in Fabry-Perot Interferometer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the correct angle, theta1, for light incidence in a Fabry-Perot interferometer. It clarifies that for normal incidence, theta1 is zero degrees, which aligns with the textbook example. The confusion arises from the assumption that theta1 might be 45 degrees when light hits the boundary of the plate. A side view sketch is suggested to visualize the angles involved. Ultimately, the consensus is that for normal incidence, the transmission angle is indeed zero.
Blanchdog
Messages
56
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
What are the free spectral range and fringe width in a Fabry-Perot Interferometer made up of two silver coated plates each with reflectance R = 0.9, transmittance T = 0.05, and Absorbance A = 0.05? The plate separation is d = 0.5cm with interior index n1 = 1. Suppose the wavelength being observed near normal incidence is 587nm.
Relevant Equations
FSR = wavelength^2/(2 n d cos (theta1))
Sorry for the lack of formatting, I'm in a rush to write this before I go pick someone up from work. My question is what is theta1? Is it 45 degrees because that's the angle the light hits the boundary of the plate to the n1 medium? Or is it 0? It seems like it should be 45 but there's an example in the textbook that uses 0. Or is cos(theta1) imaginary? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
near normal incidence
For normal incidence this ##\theta## is zero. The central black spot in the first picture here . Make a side view sketch (or look further down :smile:) to see where ##\ \theta\ne 0\ ## comes in.

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
For normal incidence this ##\theta## is zero. The central black spot in the first picture here . Make a side view sketch (or look further down :smile:) to see where ##\ \theta\ne 0\ ## comes in.

##\ ##
Ah thank you, I was getting tripped up because I knew ##\theta_1## was the transmission angle but couldn't figure out what it was, but if the light is at normal incidence then the transmission angle will be zero.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
52
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top