Correct Use of the Parallel Axis Theorem for Moment of Inertia

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the correct application of the Parallel Axis Theorem for calculating the moment of inertia. The user initially calculates the moment of inertia for a rod in two cases but arrives at incorrect values, particularly for the second case with arms stretched. The error stems from not properly applying the theorem, specifically neglecting to use the moment of inertia about the center of mass. After clarification, the user acknowledges the mistake and realizes the need to incorporate the correct formula. Accurate application of the theorem is essential for obtaining the correct moment of inertia values.
simphys
Messages
327
Reaction score
46
Homework Statement
In order to increase her moment of inertia about a vertical axis, a spinning figure skater stretches out her arms horizontally; in order to reduce her
moment of inertia, she brings her arms down vertically along her sides. Calculate the change of moment of inertia between these two configurations of the arms. Assume that each arm is a thin, uniform rod of length 0.60 m and mass
2.8 kg hinged at the shoulder at a distance of 0.20 m from the axis of rotation.
Relevant Equations
xD
so calculated, the moment of inertia for a rod about an axis at the end of the rod is I = 1/3 * M * L^2
here for case 1: arms to the side
I is calculated to be ##I = 0.224##

for case 2: arms stretched
## I = 1 / 3 * M * L^2 + M * d^2 ## with L = 0.6 m (length of rod) and d = 0.2 (dinstance from 'hinge' to axis of rotation)
## I = 0.896## is my answer.
Yet the actual answer is ##I = 1.568##. I don't really understand what I am doing wrong here so can someone help me please?

Reasoning:
In case 2 I basically have the moment of inertia at the end (the 'hinge'/shoulder so to say) and need to add a dinstance d to get the moment of inertia about the rotation axis via the parallel axis theorem yet this isn't correct.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
simphys said:
for case 2: arms stretched
## I = 1 / 3 * M * L^2 + M * d^2 ## with L = 0.6 m (length of rod) and d = 0.2 (dinstance from 'hinge' to axis of rotation)
## I = 0.896## is my answer.
You have not used the parallel axis theorem correctly. $$I = I_{\rm cm} + md^2$$ What does ##I_{\rm cm}## mean?
What does ##d## mean?
 
  • Like
Likes simphys and hutchphd
TSny said:
You have not used the parallel axis theorem correctly. $$I = I_{\rm cm} + md^2$$ What does ##I_{\rm cm}## mean?
What does ##d## mean?
yeah apologies it should have been 2 times the symbolic equation, just forgot to type it out.
Omg... totally forgot that... thanks a lot... I needed to use the moment of inertia about the center of mass basically..,.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top