Cost/Benefits of an RF Cavity vs Quartz Oscillator

In summary, the 8640B is a RF signal generator that was used in the early 1970s to generate signals for spectrum analysis. It uses a quartz crystal oscillator as the frequency reference, has low phase noise, and is tunable.
  • #1
Twigg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
893
483
I just encountered an RF cavity in the wild for the first time. It was used as the frequency reference in the Agilent 8640B RF signal generator, which I believe dates back to the 70's. Were quartz oscillators not an option back then? Or were they worse in stability back then? I'm curious about the cost/benefit analysis from that period, if anyone knows. Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Quartz crystals cannot be made for fundamental frequencies above approx 24 MHz. Operation at overtone frequencies allows operation up to about 250 MHz, but at low power. Of course, harmonics of the crystal oscillator can be used at higher frequencies. Cavity resonators become larger as the frequency goes down, so are impractical inside test equipment, below, say, 1000 MHz. Transmission line resonators are good for the VHF range where the dimensions are practicable, but at lower freqeuncies the line losses increase making them less attractive.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DaveE, Twigg, dlgoff and 3 others
  • #3
A tuned RF cavity can be used to select one harmonic of a crystal oscillator. For example, a 2500 MHz high-Q cavity can select the 25th harmonic of 100 MHz, generated from a lower frequency crystal oscillator. That produces a very low phase noise signal that can be used to down-convert microwave signals. PLL synthesizers have higher phase noise and so are not suitable for high quality instruments such as microwave spectrum analysers.
The problem with narrowband high-Q RF cavities is that they must be physically rigid and temperature stabilised.
 
  • Like
Likes Twigg
  • #4
The RF source for the HP8640B is a 256 to 512 MHz mechanically tuned cavity, with electronic varactor control to trim the frequency and to introduce FM.
Frequency accuracy comes from the inbuilt frequency meter that is based on an internal 5 MHz crystal oscillator.

The HP service manual is helpful.
HP8640B said:
The cavity is a foreshortened type which is essentially a length of coaxial transmission line with a short at one end and a capacitive load at the other. The shorted transmission line is less than 1/4 wavelength long at the frequency of oscillation and its impedance is inductive. The cavity resonates at the frequency at which the inductive reactance of the transmission line equals the capacitive reactance of the load capacitor.
HP8640B said:
The resonant frequency is varied by changing the length of the cavity (a secondary effect) and by changing the load capacitance. The varactor diodes are in parallel with the main load capacitance. The cavity is mechanically fine tuned by protruding a small metal slug into the cavity. Signal is coupled out of the cavity into two buffer amplifiers by loops which protrude into the cavity.
 
  • Informative
Likes Twigg
  • #5
  • Informative
Likes Twigg

FAQ: Cost/Benefits of an RF Cavity vs Quartz Oscillator

What is an RF cavity and how does it differ from a quartz oscillator?

An RF (radio frequency) cavity is a resonant chamber used to generate or amplify radio waves at a specific frequency. It consists of two or more conductive plates separated by a small gap, and the radio waves are produced by an oscillating current between the plates. A quartz oscillator, on the other hand, is a type of electronic oscillator that uses the mechanical resonance of a quartz crystal to generate an electrical signal at a precise frequency.

What are the main advantages of using an RF cavity over a quartz oscillator?

One of the main advantages of an RF cavity is its ability to generate high power output at a specific frequency. This makes it ideal for applications that require a strong and stable radio signal, such as in particle accelerators or high-power communication systems. Additionally, RF cavities are more durable and have a longer lifespan compared to quartz oscillators.

Are there any drawbacks to using an RF cavity instead of a quartz oscillator?

One potential drawback of an RF cavity is its larger size and higher cost compared to a quartz oscillator. RF cavities also require more complex and precise tuning, which can be a challenge for some applications. Additionally, the use of RF cavities may introduce additional noise in the signal, which can affect the overall performance of the system.

In what situations would it be more beneficial to use a quartz oscillator over an RF cavity?

Quartz oscillators are often preferred for applications that require a highly accurate and stable frequency, such as in precision timing devices or frequency standards. They also have a smaller size and lower cost compared to RF cavities, making them more suitable for portable or cost-sensitive applications.

How do the cost and benefits of using an RF cavity vs a quartz oscillator compare in the long run?

The cost and benefits of using an RF cavity vs a quartz oscillator may vary depending on the specific application and requirements. In the long run, however, the durability and longer lifespan of RF cavities may result in lower maintenance and replacement costs compared to quartz oscillators. Additionally, the high power output of RF cavities may lead to cost savings in terms of energy consumption. Ultimately, the best option will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.

Similar threads

Back
Top